rss
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2005;76:176-180 doi:10.1136/jnnp.2004.047118
  • Paper

Quantitative assessment of driving performance in Parkinson’s disease

  1. J M Wood1,
  2. C Worringham2,
  3. G Kerr2,
  4. K Mallon1,
  5. P Silburn3
  1. 1School of Optometry, Queensland University of Technology, Victoria Park Road, Kelvin Grove Q4059, Australia
  2. 2School of Human Movement Studies, Queensland University of Technology
  3. 3Neurology Department, PA Hospital, Brisbane, Q4102 Australia
  1. Correspondence to:
 Dr J M Wood
 School of Optometry, Queensland University of Technology, Victoria Park Road, Kelvin Grove Q4059, Australia; j.woodqut.edu.au
  • Received 7 June 2004
  • Accepted 9 September 2004
  • Revised 8 September 2004

Abstract

Objectives: The primary aim of this study was to determine how Parkinson’s disease (PD) affects driving performance. It also examined whether changes in driver safety were related to specific clinical disease markers or an individual’s self rating of driving ability.

Methods: The driving performance of 25 patients with idiopathic PD and 21 age matched controls was assessed on a standardised open road route by an occupational therapist and driving instructor, to provide overall safety ratings and specific driving error scores.

Results: The drivers with PD were rated as significantly less safe (p<0.05) than controls, and more than half of the drivers with PD would not have passed a state based driving test. The driver safety ratings were more strongly related to disease duration (r = −0.60) than to their on time Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (r = −0.24). Drivers with PD made significantly more errors than the control group during manoeuvres that involved changing lanes and lane keeping, monitoring their blind spot, reversing, car parking, and traffic light controlled intersections. The driving instructor also had to intervene to avoid an incident significantly more often for drivers with PD than for controls. Interestingly, driver safety ratings were unrelated to an individual’s rating of their own driving performance, and this was the case for all participants.

Conclusions: As a group, drivers with PD are less safe to drive than age matched controls. Standard clinical markers cannot reliably predict driver safety. Further studies are required to ascertain whether the identified driving difficulties can be ameliorated.

Footnotes

  • * This apparent difference was caused by a non-normal distribution: a subgroup of the controls drove longer distances. However, the mean values were in the same category of 3–4 hours/week.

  • Competing interests: none declared

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

BMJ Careers - Latest neurology and neurosurgery jobs