Article Text

Download PDFPDF
A study of the workload and effectiveness of a comprehensive acute stroke service
  1. N U Weir,
  2. A M Buchan
  1. Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Calgary, Canada
  1. Correspondence to:
 Dr N U Weir
 Room 1211, Foothills Medical Centre, 1403–29th Street NW, Calgary, Canada T2N 2T9; nicweirhotmail.com

Abstract

Objective: To study the workload of and use of acute intervention within an established acute stroke service, the Calgary Stroke Programme (CSP).

Methods: Prospective record of all acute referrals, diagnoses, and management decisions over a 4 month period.

Results: The CSP received 572 referrals (median: 32 per week), 88% of which were made between 7 am and midnight. Of the 427 patients seen in person, 29% had not had an acute stroke or transient ischaemic attack (TIA). Fifty percent of patients with suspected acute stroke were referred within 3 h of symptom onset and 11% with acute ischaemic stroke (equating to 35% of those referred within 3 h of onset and seen in person) were treated with thrombolysis.

Conclusion: Centralisation of services facilitates the rapid referral of, and use of acute interventions in, patients with acute stroke and TIA. Centralised services are likely to be busy (although less so at night), to attract large numbers of patients with disorders that mimic stroke and TIA, and yet still likely to treat only the minority of acute strokes using thrombolysis. These observations may help those planning similar services and underline the need to develop more widely applicable treatments for acute stroke.

  • AIS, acute ischaemic stroke
  • CSP, Calgary Stroke Programme
  • IA, intra-arterial
  • IV, intravenous
  • TIA, transient ischaemic attack

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Footnotes

  • This project has not received any specific funding. However, the research work of the Calgary Stroke Programme is supported by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research, the Alberta Heritage Foundation for Medical Research, the Canadian Stroke Network, the Canadian Stroke Consortium, and the Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada.

  • Competing interests: none declared

  • We did not seek ethical approval prior to this study because our study related only to an audit of our activity and because the data we collected were entirely anonymous.

Linked Articles