Article Text

PDF

Objective B wave analysis in 55 patients with non-communicating and communicating hydrocephalus
  1. H Stephensen1,
  2. N Andersson2,
  3. A Eklund2,
  4. J Malm3,
  5. M Tisell1,
  6. C Wikkelsö1
  1. 1Hydrocephalus Research Unit, Institute of Clinical Neuroscience, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Göteborg University, Göteborg, Sweden
  2. 2Department of Biomedical Engineering and Informatics, University of Umeå, Umeå, Sweden
  3. 3Department of Clinical Neuroscience, University of Umeå
  1. Correspondence to:
 Dr Magnus Tisell
 Hydrocephalus Research Unit, Institute of Clinical Neuroscience, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Göteborg University, 413 45 Göteborg, Sweden; magnus.tisellvgregion.se

Abstract

Background: B waves, slow and rhythmic oscillations in intracranial pressure (ICP), are claimed to be one of the best predictors of outcome after surgery for normal pressure hydrocephalus (NPH).

Object: To determine the relation between the percentage of B waves and outcome in patients with hydrocephalus, and also the diurnal variation of B waves.

Methods: ICP and patient behaviour were recorded overnight (17 to 26 hours) in 29 patients with non-communicating hydrocephalus and 26 with NPH. The B wave activity, measured with an amplitude threshold of 0.5, 0.75, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 3.0, and 5.0 mm Hg, was estimated as the percentage of total monitoring time (% B waves) using a computer algorithm, and correlated with postoperative outcome, defined as changes in 12 standardised symptoms and signs.

Results: There was no linear correlation between improvement after surgery in the 55 patients and total % B waves, but a correlation was found between improvement and % B waves during sleep (r = 0.39, p = 0.04). The percentage of B waves was the same during sleep and wakefulness, and patients with NPH had the same proportion of B waves as the non-communicating patients.

Conclusions: B waves are commonly observed in patients with both communicating and non-communicating hydrocephalus, but are only weakly related to the degree of postsurgical improvement.

  • ICP, intracranial pressure
  • NPH, normal pressure hydrocephalus
  • B waves
  • computerised data acquisition
  • hydrocephalus

Statistics from Altmetric.com

B waves, which are slow and rhythmic oscillations in the intracranial pressure (ICP), are defined as periods of 0.5 to 2 minutes with an increase in pressure amplitude from discernible up to 50 mm Hg.1 The physiological mechanisms behind the B waves are still obscure.2–4 B waves are frequent in hydrocephalus5–7 but are also reported in non-hydrocephalic patients12 and in healthy individuals.8

Several reports have indicated that the frequent occurrence of B waves predicts a positive outcome to shunt surgery.5,6,9,10 However, as the analyses of the B waves in these studies were undertaken visually and there were limitations to the study design, the predictive value of B wave analysis is still disputed. Eklund et al recently presented a computerised method for analysis of B waves.11 They found a correlation coefficient of r = 0.74 between visual interpretation and the computerised analysis.11

Improved diagnostic and predictive methods in hydrocephalus are needed.12 We evaluated the predictive value of B waves using the technique developed by Eklund et al on patients with communicating and non-communicating hydrocephalus who underwent ICP recordings at our hydrocephalus research unit.

The specific aims of our study were to determine the relation between the proportion of B waves and the outcome of shunt surgery or third ventriculostomy; to compare the percentage of B waves during sleep and wakefulness; and to compare the percentage of B waves in communicating and non-communicating hydrocephalus.

METHODS

Patients

Between 1995 and 2000, 142 patients had surgery for hydrocephalus in our unit. The diagnosis was based on a typical clinical picture and enlarged ventricles (Evan’s index >0.30). Sixty three of these patients underwent overnight ICP recording (not done in the remaining patients because of limited resources, patient refusal, or medical reasons).

Of these 63 patients, eight were excluded because their ICP recordings were unsuccessful (four because of malfunctioning pressure sensors, two because of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage, and two because they became agitated during the recording. Thus the study population consisted of 55 patients (29 with non-communicating hydrocephalus, 13 with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (INPH), and 13 with secondary normal pressure hydrocephalus). Age, sex, and aetiology are given in detail in table 1.

Table 1

 Demographic and outcome data after endoscopic third ventriculostomy or shunt surgery in 29 patients with non-communicating hydrocephalus and in 26 patients with normal pressure hydrocephalus

Patients were diagnosed as “non-communicating” if radionuclide cisternography showed no retrograde ventricular filling13,14 and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) indicated obstructed outflow from any of the ventricles. NPH was diagnosed when there was a patent aqueduct on MRI (often flow void signal) and retrograde filling of the ventricles on radionuclide cisternography.

The patients with non-communicating hydrocephalus underwent endoscopic third ventriculostomy or shunt surgery. Patients with remaining or relapsing hydrocephalus symptoms in spite of a patent ventriculostomy were offered secondary shunt surgery. All patients with NPH were operated on with a CSF shunt.

The valves used were Sophy™ programmable valves (Sophysa, Orsay Cedex, France), Delta™ shunts, and Strata™ programmable valves (Medtronic PS Medical, Santa Barbara, California, USA).

The Göteborg University ethics committee approved the study, and informed consent was obtained from the patients and their relatives.

Preoperative and postoperative evaluation

Patients completed a clinical test battery and MRI or computed tomography was carried out preoperatively and three months postoperatively. If no improvement was observed in spite of adjustment of the valve to low pressure, the shunt system was checked by a shunt function test15,16 and in case of dysfunction was surgically corrected. The postoperative investigation was postponed until three months after the latest corrective surgery.

Patients who initially underwent a third ventriculostomy and who later received a CSF shunt were finally registered three months after the shunt operation.

Clinical test battery

For an accurate description of the preoperative symptoms and postoperative improvement, we recorded 12 clinical variables. This test battery has been described previously in detail.17,18 We have shown that these variables improve significantly after shunt surgery or third ventriculostomy in patients with both communicating and non-communicating hydrocephalus.17–19

The variables were standardised to enable direct comparisons of values with different numerical scales.15,20 Indices of psychometric performance (Bingley’s visual memory test; identical forms test; mini-mental state examination score), gait ability (general assessment of gait; walking (number of steps and time in seconds); climbing steps (in seconds)), alertness (daily sleep; reaction time test; impairment of wakefulness), balance (Romberg’s test), and social function (living conditions) were calculated from the mean of the standardised variables. In each index, all variables had the same weight. In the postoperative statistics, the mean and standard deviation of the preoperative variables were used in the standardisation. The difference in the preoperative and postoperative values of each index was calculated, and a total index score—the mean of the differences (MoD)—in each patient was determined from the five equally weighted indices as the overall result after shunt surgery. An MoD of more than 0 implied postoperative improvement.

B wave analysis

The decision to operate was taken before the ICP was recorded, and the recordings were not analysed until after the patients had been re-examined three months after their most recent surgery.

Instruments and data acquisition

Instruments used for data acquisition were a strain gauge ICP microsensor (Codman ICP MicroSensors™) with a corresponding ventricle catheter, a pressure monitor (Cardiocap II, Datex, Finland), an analogue to digital converter, a data acquisition program (MP100 and Acknowledge™, Biopac Systems Inc, Goleta, California, USA), and a personal computer. The data acquisition system was thoroughly tested for calibration errors and drift. ICP data were collected at 50 Hz (50 samples/second).

ICP recording

The ICP recording was started the day before treatment, using an intraventricular pressure sensor. The ventricular catheter was fixed in the burr hole with a silicone plug and the burr hole was sealed with Tisseel® to prevent leakage of CSF. The recording continued for 17 to 26 hours. The patients were under continuous observation, and their activity, awake or sleeping, and body positions were documented at least every 10 minutes.21 The patients could move freely in bed, sit in a chair, or stand beside the bed and were disconnected from the ICP monitor only during toilet visits. These observations were used to divide the ICP recording into periods of sleep and wakefulness. Immediately before the operation the sensors were removed and tested for zero level.

Data analysis

Basic extraction of ICP data was done with the computer software Acknowledge™ 3.2. The B wave frequency was determined by computer software as described by Eklund et al.11 The algorithm is based on an individual wave analysis, which considers every waveform with a wavelength of 0.5 to 2 minutes and an amplitude of at least a predefined threshold value (0.5, 0.75, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 3.0, and 5.0 mm Hg) as a B wave (fig 1A). A filter of Butterworth type (fifth order) was applied to filter out the wavelength interval of interest (fig 1B), and a waveform was classified as a B wave if the absolute value of its peak or trough was at least as large as the threshold value. A waveform was considered as a new wave when it passed the zero pressure level. The total B wave incidence was determined as the amount of B wave time divided by the total monitoring time (% B waves). The ICP recordings were analysed separately during sleep, wakefulness, and total monitoring time for all patients.

Figure 1

 (A) Sample recording of intracranial pressure (ICP) obtained from one patient. (B) Data from (A) filtered using a digital bandpass filter of Butterworth type (fifth order). Cut off frequencies correspond to a wavelength interval of 0.5 to 2 minutes. A computer algorithm for individual wave analysis was used, and sections classified as B waves are marked with a horizontal line. The total B wave incidence was determined as the accumulated time with sections classified as B waves, divided by the total monitoring time. For this sample the proportion of B waves was 39% at a threshold level of 1.0 mm Hg.

Statistics

Descriptive statistics were generated and the Mann–Whitney U and Spearman rank order tests were used for group comparisons and correlation analyses. No corrections for multiple comparisons were done. A paired test (Wilcoxon) was used for intraindividual analyses.

RESULTS

Postoperative outcome

Three months after surgery, 45 of the patients (82%) had improved, four had deteriorated, and six were unchanged (table 1). The improvement was similar in the non-communicating and the NPH groups (table 1).

Twenty one patients with non-communicating hydrocephalus underwent a third ventriculostomy and eight received a CSF shunt. Owing to an insufficient clinical effect of the ventriculostomy, 10 patients later underwent shunt surgery. One patient, who had received a CSF shunt, had the shunt removed because of infection and later underwent a third ventriculostomy. There were six shunt revisions—three because of shunt infection, two for obstruction of the abdominal catheter, and one because of local abdominal pain.

B waves

The percentage of B waves decreased with increasing amplitude thresholds: from 85% of the time with an amplitude of 0.5 mm Hg to 5% with an amplitude of 5 mm Hg (fig 2).

Figure 2

 Distribution of B wave activity, estimated as the percentage of total monitoring time (% B waves) during sleep, in 29 patients with non-communicating hydrocephalus and 26 with normal pressure hydrocephalus (NPH). Patients with non-communicating hydrocephalus had the same percentage of B waves as patients with NPH.

The thresholds 1.0 and 1.5 mm Hg most effectively separated the patients into different levels of B wave activity with distributions closest to the normal distribution (fig 2), and the threshold 1.0 mm Hg analysis also showed the highest correlation coefficients with outcome. Therefore the results below relate to a threshold of 1.0 mm Hg.

There was no correlation between overall improvement after surgery and the total percentage of B waves (fig 3). A weak correlation (r = 0.39, p = 0.04) was found between improvement and percentage of B waves during sleep.

Figure 3

 The correlation between total B wave activity at an amplitude threshold of 1.0 mm Hg and the clinical outcome, expressed as mean of differences (MoD) between preoperative and postoperative scores on four clinical indices.

In patients with non-communicating hydrocephalus, the total percentage of B waves correlated with improvement in psychometric performance, and percentage of B waves during sleep correlated with the overall improvement (r = 0.39, p = 0.04) and the improvement in psychometric performance (r = 0.46, p = 0.01).

In patients with NPH, no significant correlations were found between the percentage of B waves and any functional index. The percentage of B waves was the same during sleep and wakefulness at all amplitude thresholds (fig 4). Patients with NPH had the same percentage of B waves as patients with non-communicating hydrocephalus (fig 2). ICP correlated positively with the percentage of B waves at all threshold levels, with correlation coefficients ranging between 0.47 and 0.33 (p<0.002).

Figure 4

 B wave activity in 55 hydrocephalic patients during sleep, wakefulness, and total recording time. Intracranial pressure (ICP) was recorded continuously overnight (17 to 26 hours). B wave activity was estimated as the percentage of total monitoring time (per cent B waves). A B wave was defined as a wavelength of 0.5 to 2 minutes with an amplitude of at least a predefined threshold value. The threshold values 0.5, 0.75, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 3.0, and 5.0 mm Hg were analysed.

DISCUSSION

B waves occurred frequently in our 55 patients with hydrocephalus, but there was no linear correlation between improvement after surgery and the overall percentage of B waves. This suggests that B waves are a physiological phenomenon related to the state of hydrocephalus, but are not strongly related to mechanisms that determinate the degree of postsurgical improvement.

Lundberg attributed the origin of the rhythmic B waves to the Cheyne–Stokes respiration in his non-intubated patients, with concomitant increases in Pco2.1 Later, B waves were also seen in ventilated patients, and Venes22 suggested an autonomic brain stem rhythm as the direct pacemaker of ICP fluctuations with simultaneous vascular oscillations. Magnaes suggested that B waves were generated by changes in intracranial blood volume reflecting blood pressure waves and brain autoregulation.23,24

Predictive value of B waves

B waves are seen in healthy individuals,8 in traumatic brain injury,25 and in other brain disorders,26 and are very frequent in hydrocephalus,5,6,10 as also shown in this study. The proportion of B waves in our patients varied from 24% to 96% for the 1.0 mm Hg threshold level.

As B waves are a normal phenomenon seen in healthy individuals, only the proportion of B waves present can be regarded as diagnostically important. Long term sampling of ICP from healthy individuals cannot be done for ethical reasons, and the true predictive value of B waves in hydrocephalic patients is therefore difficult to estimate.

In our patients, B wave analysis predicted surgical outcome, dichotomised as improved/not improved, with a sensitivity of 0.78 and a specificity of 0.60 with the threshold of 1.0 mm Hg. The positive predictive value was 0.90 and the negative predictive value was 0.38. These results are, however, to be expected when analysing a group of patients in whom 82% are improved by the procedure and where the analysed predictor is an associated phenomenon, as it obviously is in hydrocephalus. If the positive predictive value of having B waves for more than 50% of the time in this group was determined by chance only, it would be 0.82.

Physiologically, an abrupt increase in ICP (B wave) caused by an increase in arterial intracranial blood volume can be compensated by an adjustment of arterial blood pressure or oxygen extraction, an increased outflow of venous blood into the venous system, or an increased outflow of CSF into the spinal subarachnoid space. Disturbances of either vascular or CSF mechanisms might be the reason for the high proportion of B waves in hydrocephalus.

Resistance to CSF outflow (Rout) is typically disturbed in hydrocephalic patients, which could explain the high B wave frequency seen in this group. A high correlation27,28 between the amount of B wave activity and Rout has been described, but also weak correlations that only exist at high pressure levels.29 A recent study indicates that the proportion of B waves is more related to the elastance of the cranio-spinal system.30

A major advantage of our computerised method is that it identifies B waves according to a strict definition and is not subject to investigator bias. The method used in this study was based on the criteria used in traditional visual interpretation, and has previously been shown to correlate with visual interpretation.11 B wave analysis has been proposed as a reliable diagnostic test for hydrocephalus, but the significance of B waves remains unclear.31 The lack of a significant correlation between outcome after shunt surgery and the objectively determined overall B wave activity seen in this study, which included rather a large number of patients, does not support any strong relation.

B waves during sleep

Krauss et al showed that there is a relation between the relative frequency, absolute amplitude, wavelength, and morphology of B waves and different sleep stages.32 The relative proportion of B waves was higher during REM sleep and sleep stage 2 compared with wakefulness, and the absolute amplitude was higher during REM sleep than during wakefulness.32 We did not analyse sleep stages, but we carefully observed whether the patients were asleep or awake. Our finding of a correlation between overall improvement and the proportion of B waves during sleep supports the importance of B wave analysis during sleep stages, and further studies on B waves as a predictor might focus on B waves during sleep. However, we found no differences in the proportion of B waves during sleep or wakefulness at any of the thresholds. An increase in B wave activity at night might be expected, as CSF production has a nightly peak at approximately 2 am, when production is approximately twice the daytime values.33

Communicating and non-communicating hydrocephalus

There are differences in CSF dynamics between communicating and non-communicating hydrocephalus which might be reflected by differences in B wave patterns. We found no differences between the two groups, but this finding might be influenced by the significant age difference between them. If it is accepted that B waves are related to changes in intracranial blood volume, then recent studies showing that there is no transmantle pressure gradient,21 and that Rout is the same in the ventricular system as in the subarachnoid space in non-communicating hydrocephalus,15 support our findings.

Conclusions

B waves are a commonly observed in hydrocephalus, but only weakly related to the degree of post-surgical improvement. The proportion of B waves was the same during sleep and wakefulness, and patients with NPH had the same proportion of B waves as the non-communicating patients.

REFERENCES

View Abstract

Footnotes

  • Competing interests: none declared

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.