rss
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2005;76:1186-1187 doi:10.1136/jnnp.2004.061481
  • STN stimulation
  • Editorial commentary

STN stimulation and neuroprotection in Parkinson’s disease—when beautiful theories meet ugly facts

  1. P C Warnke
  1. Correspondence to:
 Professor Peter C Warnke
 The University of Liverpool, Department of Neuroscience, The Walton Centre for Neurology and Neurosurgery, Lower Lane, Liverpool L97LJ, UK; p.c.warnkeliv.ac.uk

    STN stimulation does not halt progression of Parkinson’s disease

    Repeated claims have been made that inactivation of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) is a neuroprotective measure.1–3 It was postulated that by suppression of the glutamatergic STN, glutamate mediated excitotoxicity exerted on the substantia nigra could be reduced, if not abolished. The paper by Hilker et al in this issue (see page 1217) deals with this topic by looking longitudinally at patients who have undergone successful STN stimulation. The investigators have taken the approach of using objective functional imaging employing 18F-DOPA positron emission tomography (PET), an established objective measure of biological progression in Parkinson’s disease, which was then correlated with clinical progression. They were able to show convincingly that STN stimulation did not halt the progression of Parkinson’s disease.

    They have also shown …

    Responses to this article

    Register for free content

    The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

    Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

    BMJ Careers - Latest neurology and neurosurgery jobs