rss

This article has a correction

Please see: J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2006;77:892

J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2006;77:429-438 doi:10.1136/jnnp.2005.072926
  • Review

Clinical trials in mild cognitive impairment: lessons for the future

  1. V Jelic,
  2. M Kivipelto,
  3. B Winblad
  1. NEUROTEC Department, Division of Geriatric Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Division of Geriatric Medicine, Karolinska University Hospital – Huddinge, Stockholm, Sweden
  1. Correspondence to:
 Dr Bengt Winblad
 Karolinska Institutet, Neurotec Department, Division of Geriatric Medicine, Karolinska University Hospital – Huddinge, NOVUM, plan 5, 141 86 Stockholm, Sweden; bengt.winblad{at}ki.se
  • Received 30 May 2005
  • Accepted 17 November 2005
  • Revised 15 November 2005
  • Published Online First 23 November 2005

Abstract

Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) is an operational definition for a cognitive decline in individuals with a greater risk of developing dementia. The amnestic subtype of MCI is of particular interest because these individuals most likely progress to Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Currently hypothesised therapeutic approaches in MCI are mainly based on AD treatment strategies. Long term secondary prevention randomised clinical trials have been completed in amnestic MCI populations, encompassing agents with various mechanisms of action: acetylcholinesterase inhibitors (donepezil, rivastigmine, galantamine), antioxidants (vitamin E), anti-inflammatories (rofecoxib), and nootropics (piracetam). The design of clinical trials in MCI is influenced by study objectives and definition of primary end points: time to clinical diagnosis of dementia, and AD in particular, or symptom progression. As none of the drugs previously shown to have clinical efficacy in AD trials or benefit in everyday practice have met the primary objectives of the respective trials, design of future clinical trials in MCI should be further developed particularly as regards the selection of more homogeneous samples at entry, optimal treatment duration, and multidimensional and reliable outcomes.

Footnotes

  • Published Online First 23 November 2005

  • Competing interests: the authors have not received research grants from any of the pharmaceutical companies marketing anti-dementia drugs, neither have they have stocks in any of these companies. Dr Bengt Winblad received consultancy fees for advisory board meetings from most companies marketing anti-dementia drugs. Dr Miia Kivipelto received consulting fees for an advisory board meeting from Pfizer. All authors received fees for lecturing or organising education sponsored by Novartis.

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

BMJ Careers - Latest neurology and neurosurgery jobs