Article Text

PDF
Modification of MRI criteria for multiple sclerosis in patients with clinically isolated syndromes
  1. J K Swanton1,
  2. K Fernando1,
  3. C M Dalton1,
  4. K A Miszkiel2,
  5. A J Thompson1,
  6. G T Plant3,
  7. D H Miller1
  1. 1NMR Research Unit, Institute of Neurology, University College London, Queen Square, London, UK
  2. 2Department of Neuroradiology, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, Queen Square
  3. 3Physician’s Clinic, Moorfields Eye Hospital, City Road, London
  1. Correspondence to:
 Professor D H Miller
 NMR Research Unit, 6th Floor, Institute of Neurology, Queen Square, London WC1N 3BG, UK; d.miller{at}ion.ucl.ac.uk

Abstract

Background: The McDonald criteria include MRI evidence for dissemination in space and dissemination in time for the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis in young adult patients who present with clinically isolated syndromes (CIS) typical of the disease. Although a major advance, the criteria have limited sensitivity for making an early diagnosis.

Objective: To compare the performance of McDonald criteria and modified McDonald criteria for dissemination in space and time for assessing the development of clinically definite multiple sclerosis.

Methods: McDonald criteria were modified using the combination of a less stringent definition for dissemination in space and allowing a new T2 lesion per se after three months as evidence for dissemination in time. Modified and McDonald criteria were applied in 90 CIS patients at baseline and at three month follow up scans.

Results: Both criteria were highly specific (>90%) but the modified criteria were more sensitive (77% v 46%) and more accurate (86% v 73%).

Conclusions: These modified criteria should be evaluated in other CIS cohorts.

  • CDMS, clinically definite multiple sclerosis
  • CIS, clinically isolated syndrome
  • multiple sclerosis
  • clinically isolated syndrome
  • magnetic resonance imaging
  • diagnosis

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Footnotes

  • Published Online First 25 July 2005

  • Competing interests: DHM has received grant support from Biogen Idec, Elan, Schering, and GlaxoSmithKline for performance of MRI analyses in clinical trials; honoraria for advisory or consultancy work, lectures, and related travel and accommodation expenses from Aventis, Biogen Idec, Bristol Myers Squibb, GlaxoSmithKline, Schering, Serono, UCB Pharma, and Wyeth. KF received salary support from Biogen Idec. CMD received salary support from Elan. GTP has received travel and accommodation expenses from Alcon. AJT has received honoraria for lecturing from Aventis and Schering. JS and KM have nothing to declare. The organisations mentioned in this conflict of interest statement did not participate in any aspect of the study design, execution, analysis, or write up.

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.