rss
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2006;77:1004-1007 doi:10.1136/jnnp.2005.086983
  • Paper

Structural anatomy of pure and hemianopic alexia

  1. A P Leff1,
  2. G Spitsyna1,
  3. G T Plant2,
  4. R J S Wise1
  1. 1MRC Clinical Sciences Centre and Division of Neuroscience, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College, Hammersmith Hospital, London, UK
  2. 2Department of Neuro-ophthalmology, Moorfields Eye Hospital, London
  1. Correspondence to:
 A P Leff
 Wellcome Department of Imaging Neuroscience, 12 Queen Square, London WC1N 3BG, UK;a.leff{at}fil.ion.ucl.ac.uk
  • Received 23 December 2005
  • Accepted 20 June 2006
  • Revised 17 May 2006
  • Published Online First 26 June 2006

Abstract

Background: The two most common types of acquired reading disorder resulting from damage to the territory of the dominant posterior cerebral artery are hemianopic and pure alexia. Patients with pronounced hemianopic alexia have a right homonymous hemianopia that encroaches into central or parafoveal vision; they read individual words well, but generate inefficient reading saccades when reading along a line of text. Patients with pure alexia also often have a hemianopia but are more disabled, making frequent errors on individual words; they have sustained damage to a brain region that supports efficient word identification.

Objective: To investigate the differences in lesion site between hemianopic alexia and pure alexia groups, as rehabilitative techniques differ between the two conditions.

Methods: High-resolution magnetic resonance images were obtained from seven patients with hemianopic alexia and from six patients with pure alexia caused by a left occipital stroke. The boundary of each lesion was defined and lesion volumes were then transformed into a standard stereotactic space so that regional comparisons could be made.

Results: The two patient groups did not differ in terms of damage to the medial left occipital lobe, but those with pure alexia had additional lateral damage to the posterior fusiform gyrus and adjacent tissue.

Conclusions: Clinicians will be able to predict the type of reading disorder patients with left occipital lesions have from simple tests of reading speed and the distribution of damage to the left occipital lobe on brain imaging. This information will aid management decisions, including recommendations for reading rehabilitation.

Footnotes

  • Published Online First 26 June 2006

  • Competing interests: None.

  • Ethical approval: This study was approved by the local research ethics committee.

    Informed consent was obtained from all the patients for being studied.

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

BMJ Careers - Latest neurology and neurosurgery jobs