rss
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2006;77:1008-1012 doi:10.1136/jnnp.2006.094417
  • Paper

Visual neglect after right posterior cerebral artery infarction

  1. C M Bird1,
  2. P Malhotra1,
  3. A Parton2,
  4. E Coulthard1,3,
  5. M F S Rushworth4,
  6. M Husain1,3
  1. 1Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College London, London, UK
  2. 2Centre for Cognition & Neuroimaging, Brunel University, Middlesex, UK
  3. 3Institute of Neurology, University College London
  4. 4Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
  1. Correspondence to:
 C M Bird
 Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College London, 17, Queen Square, London WC1N 3AR, UK;chris.bird{at}ucl.ac.uk
  • Received 28 March 2006
  • Accepted 4 June 2006
  • Revised 26 May 2006
  • Published Online First 13 June 2006

Abstract

Objectives: To investigate the characteristics and neuroanatomical correlates of visual neglect after right-sided posterior cerebral artery (PCA) infarction.

Methods: 15 patients with acute PCA strokes were screened for the presence of neglect on a comprehensive battery of cognitive tests. Extra tests of visual perception were also carried out on six patients. To establish which areas were critically associated with neglect, the lesions of patients with and without neglect were compared.

Results: Neglect of varying severity was documented in 8 patients. In addition, higher-order visual perception was impaired in 5 of the 6 patients. Neglect was critically associated with damage to an area of white matter in the occipital lobe corresponding to a white matter tract connecting the parahippocampal gyrus with the angular gyrus of the parietal lobe. Lesions of the thalamus or splenium of the corpus callosum did not appear necessary or sufficient to cause neglect, but may mediate its severity in these patients.

Conclusions: PCA stroke can result in visual neglect. Interruption of the white matter fibres connecting the parahippocampal gyrus to the angular gyrus may be important in determining whether a patient will manifest neglect.

Footnotes

  • Published Online First 14 June 2006

  • Competing interests: None declared.

This Article

  1. Abstract
  2. Full text
  3. PDF
  4. All versions of this article:
    1. jnnp.2006.094417v1
    2. jnnp.2006.094417v2
    3. 77/9/1008 most recent

Responses

  1. Submit a response
  2. No responses published

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

BMJ Careers - Latest neurology and neurosurgery jobs