Article Text

PDF
Influence of subjective visual vertical misperception on balance recovery after stroke
  1. I V Bonan1,
  2. K Hubeaux1,
  3. M C Gellez-Leman1,
  4. J P Guichard2,
  5. E Vicaut3,
  6. A P Yelnik1
  1. 1Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Department, Groupe Hospitalier Lariboisiere-F Widal APHP Paris, University Paris, Paris, France
  2. 2Radiology Department, Groupe Hospitalier Lariboisiere-F Widal APHP Paris, University Paris, Paris, France
  3. 3Clinical Investigation Unit, Groupe Hospitalier Lariboisiere-F Widal APHP Paris, University Paris, Paris, France
  1. Correspondence to:
 Dr I V Bonan
 Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Department, GH Lariboisiere-F Widal, 200 Rue du Faubourg St Denis, Paris 75010, France; isabelle.bonan{at}lrb.aphp.fr

Abstract

Background: Subjective visual vertical (SVV) perception can be perturbed after stroke, but its effect on balance recovery is not yet known.

Aim: To evaluate the influence of SVV perturbations on balance recovery after stroke.

Methods: 28 patients (14 with a right hemisphere lesion (RHL) and 14 with a left hemisphere lesion (LHL)) were included, 5 were lost to follow-up. SVV perception was initially tested within 3 months after stroke, then at 6 months, using a luminous line, which the patients adjusted to the vertical position in a dark room. Mean deviation (V) and uncertainty (U), defined as the standard deviation of the SVV, were calculated for eight trials. Balance was initially assessed by the Postural Assessment Scale for Stroke (PASS), and at 6 months by the PASS (PASS6), a force platform (lateral and sagittal stability limits (LSL6 and SSL6)), the Rivermead Mobility Index (RMI6) and gait velocity (v6). Functional outcome was also assessed by the Functional Independence Measure at 6 months (FIM6).

Results: The scores for balance and for FIM6 were related to the initial V value: PASS6 (p = 0.01, τ = −0.38); RMI6 (p = 0.002, τ = −0.48), LSL6 (p = 0.06, τ = −0.29), SSL6 (p = 0.004, τ = −0.43), v6 (p = 0.01, τ = −0.36) and FIM6 (p = 0.001, τ = −0.49), as well as to the initial U value: PASS6 (p = 0.03, τ = −0.32), RMI6 (p = 0.02, τ = −0.35), SSL6 (p = 0.005, τ = −0.43) and FIM6 (p = 0.01, τ = −0.38).

Conclusions: Initial misperception of verticality was related to a poor score for balance after stroke. This relationship seems to be independent of motricity and neglect. Rehabilitation programmes should take into account verticality misperceptions, which could be an important factors influencing balance recovery after stroke.

  • FIM, Functional Independent Measure
  • IQD, interquartile distance
  • LHL, left hemispheric lesion
  • LSL, lateral stability limit
  • PASS, Postural Assessment Scale for Stroke
  • RHL, right hemispheric lesion
  • RMI, Rivermead Mobility Index
  • SSL, sagittal stability limit
  • SVV, subjective visual vertical
  • TPJ, temporoparietal junction

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Footnotes

  • Published Online First 29 September 2006

  • Competing interests: None.

  • Ethical approval: This study was approved by the local ethics committee of the Clinical Investigation Unit, Groupe Hospitalier Lariboisiere-F.Widal APHP Paris, University Paris, Paris, France.

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Linked Articles