rss
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2007;78:1314-1319 doi:10.1136/jnnp.2006.109694
  • Paper

Effect of electrode contact location on clinical efficacy of pallidal deep brain stimulation in primary generalised dystonia

  1. S Tisch1,
  2. L Zrinzo1,
  3. P Limousin1,
  4. K P Bhatia2,
  5. N Quinn2,
  6. K Ashkan1,
  7. M Hariz1
  1. 1
    Unit of Functional Neurosurgery, Sobell Department of Motor Neuroscience, Institute of Neurology, London, UK
  2. 2
    Sobell Department of Motor Neuroscience, Institute of Neurology, London, UK
  1. Dr S Tisch, Unit of Functional Neurosurgery, Sobell Department, Institute of Neurology, University College London, Box 146, 8–11 Queen Square, London WC1N 3BG, UK; s.tisch{at}ion.ucl.ac.uk
  • Received 24 October 2006
  • Revised 12 March 2007
  • Accepted 15 March 2007
  • Published Online First 18 April 2007

Abstract

Objectives: To determine the effect of electrode contact location on efficacy of bilateral globus pallidus internus (GPi) deep brain stimulation (DBS) for primary generalised dystonia (PGD).

Subjects and methods: A consecutive series of 15 patients with PGD (10 females, mean age 42 years, seven DYT1) who underwent bilateral GPi DBS, were assessed using the Burke–Fahn–Marsden (BFM) dystonia scale before and 6 months after surgery. The position of the stimulated electrode contact(s) was determined from the postoperative stereotactic MRI. Contralateral limb and total axial BFM subscores were compared with the location of the stimulated contact(s) within the GPi.

Results: The mean total BFM score decreased from 38.9 preoperatively to 11.9 at 6 months, an improvement of 69.5% (p<0.00001). Cluster analysis of the stimulated contact coordinates identified two groups, distributed along an anterodorsal to posteroventral axis. Clinical improvement was greater for posteroventral than anterodorsal stimulation for the arm (86% vs 52%; p<0.05) and trunk (96% vs 65%; p<0.05) and inversely correlated with the y coordinate. For the leg, posteroventral and anterodorsal stimulation were of equivalent efficacy. Overall clinical improvement was maximal with posteroventral stimulation (89% vs 67%; p<0.05) and inversely correlated with the y (A-P) coordinate (r = −0.62, p<0.05).

Conclusion: GPi DBS is effective for PGD but outcome is dependent on contact location. Posteroventral GPi stimulation provides the best overall effect and is superior for the arm and trunk. These results may be explained by the functional anatomy of GPi and its outflow tracts.

Footnotes

  • Competing interests: None.

  • Abbreviations:
    BFM
    Burke–Fahn–Marsden
    DBS
    deep brain stimulation
    Gpe
    globus pallidus externus
    Gpi
    globus pallidus internus
    PD
    Parkinson’s disease
    PGD
    primary generalised dystonia

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

BMJ Careers - Latest neurology and neurosurgery jobs