rss
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2007;78:332-333 doi:10.1136/jnnp.2006.106757
  • Limbic encephalitis
  • Editorial commentary

Limbic encephalitis: extension of the diagnostic armamentarium

  1. Christian G Bien
  1. Correspondence to:
 Dr Christian G Bien
 Department of Epileptology, University of Bonn, Sigmund-Freud-Str 25, 53105 Bonn, Germany; christian.bien{at}ukb.uni-bonn.de
  • Received 25 September 2006
  • Accepted 28 September 2006
  • Revised 25 September 2006
  • Published Online First 3 October 2006

Diagnostic spectrum of limbic encephalitis

The highly specific tests for anti-Hu, anti-Ma, anti-amphiphysin and anti-CV2/CRMP5 antibodies have been an important tool in the diagnosis of paraneoplastic limbic encephalitis (PLE).1 The testing procedure for these antibodies is two tiered. Firstly, patients’ sera are incubated with brain slices from a paraformaldehyde-perfused animal (usually rat or monkey). Specific binding patterns to brain cells allow the identification of the above-named “well-characterised” antibodies. After this immunohistochemical test, a confirmatory blotting test is performed on the brain homogenate (in comparison with a positive control) or on the suspected antigen as recombinant protein. For both techniques, testing of serum is more sensitive than testing of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). The antibodies detected in this way react with intracellular antigens. They portend a poor …

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

BMJ Careers - Latest neurology and neurosurgery jobs