rss
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2007;78:350-355 doi:10.1136/jnnp.2006.106054
  • Paper

Accuracy of single-photon emission computed tomography in differentiating frontotemporal dementia from Alzheimer’s disease

  1. R McNeill1,
  2. G M Sare1,
  3. M Manoharan2,
  4. H J Testa2,
  5. D M A Mann1,
  6. D Neary1,
  7. J S Snowden1,
  8. A R Varma1
  1. 1Department of Neurology, Cerebral Function Unit, Greater Manchester Neurosciences Centre, Salford, Manchester, UK
  2. 2Nuclear Medicine, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Manchester, UK
  1. Correspondence to:
 Dr A R Varma
 Neurology Department, Greater Manchester Neurosciences Centre, Hope & NMGH Hospitals, Salford M6 8HD, UK;anoop.varma{at}srht.nhs.uk
  • Received 4 September 2006
  • Accepted 22 November 2006
  • Revised 6 November 2006
  • Published Online First 8 December 2006

Abstract

Background: Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and frontotemporal dementia (FTD) are the commonest causes of presenile dementia. In the absence of a biological marker, diagnosis is reliant on clinical evaluation. Confirmation is often sought from neuroimaging, including single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT). Most previous SPECT studies lack pathological validation.

Aim: To examine the accuracy of SPECT in differentiating FTD from AD in patients with subsequent pathological confirmation.

Methods: Technetium-99-labelled hexamethyl propylene amine oxime SPECT images obtained at initial evaluation in 25 pathologically confirmed cases of FTD were examined. These images were visually rated by an experienced blinded nuclear medicine consultant and compared with those of 31 patients with AD, also with pathological validation.

Results: A reduction in frontal cerebral blood flow (CBF) was more common in FTD and was of diagnostic value (sensitivity 0.8, specificity 0.65 and likelihood ratio (LR) 2.25; 95% CI 1.35 to 3.77). A pattern of bilateral frontal CBF reduction without the presence of associated bilateral parietal CBF change is diagnostically more accurate (sensitivity 0.80, specificity 0.81 and +LR 4.13, 95% CI 1.96 to 8.71). Diagnostic categorisation (FTD or AD) on the basis of SPECT alone was less accurate than clinical diagnosis (based on neurology and detailed neuropsychological evaluation). One patient with FTD was initially clinically misdiagnosed as AD, owing to the lack of availability of full neuropsychological assessment. However, SPECT correctly diagnosed this patient, providing a diagnostic gain of 4%.

Conclusion: Technetium-99-labelled hexamethyl propylene amine oxime SPECT CBF patterns provide valuable information in the diagnosis of FTD and AD. These data can be better used as an adjunct to clinical diagnosis if pathology is to be correctly predicted in life.

Footnotes

  • Published Online First 8 December 2006

  • Competing interests: None declared.

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

BMJ Careers - Latest neurology and neurosurgery jobs