The patient knows best: significant change in the physical component of the Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale (MSIS-29 physical)
- Lisa Costelloe1,
- Killian O’Rourke1,
- Hugh Kearney1,
- Christopher McGuigan1,
- Lisa Gribbin1,
- Marguerite Duggan1,
- Leslie Daly2,
- Niall Tubridy1,
- Michael Hutchinson1
- 1Department of Neurology, St Vincent’s University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
- 2School of Public Health Medicine and Population Science, University College, Dublin, Ireland
- Correspondence to: Professor M Hutchinson Newman Clinical Research Professor, Department of Neurology, St Vincent’s University Hospital, Dublin 4, Ireland; mhutchin{at}iol.ie
- Received 1 September 2006
- Accepted 18 February 2007
- Revised 15 January 2007
- Published Online First 1 March 2007
Abstract
Aim: The aims of this study were to determine the reliability, responsiveness and minimally important change score of the Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale (MSIS)-29 physical using the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) as an anchor measure.
Methods: 214 patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) (EDSS 0–8.5) had concurrent MSIS-29 and EDSS assessments at baseline and at up to 4 years of follow-up.
Results: 116 patients had unchanged EDSS scores. Stability of the MSIS-29 physical (mean change 0.1 points) was better in the 85 patients with EDSS 0–5.0 than in the 31 patients with EDSS 5.5–8.5 in whom the MSIS-29 physical score fell by 8 points, a response shift phenomenon. A floor effect for the MSIS-29 was observed in 5% of stable patients at both time points. 98 patients experienced EDSS change with moderately strong statistically significant correlations between change scores in the EDSS and the MSIS-29 physical (r = 0.523, p<0.0001). Effect sizes for MSIS-29 physical change were moderate to large. Using receiver operating characteristic curves, the MSIS-29 change score which produced a combination of optimal sensitivity and specificity was chosen for both EDSS ranges. For EDSS range 5.5–8, a change score of 8 had a sensitivity of 87% and specificity of 67%. For EDSS 0–5.0, a change score of 7 had a sensitivity of 78% and a specificity of 51%.
Conclusions: The MSIS-29 physical performs well over time, and is suitable for use in trials; a minimal change score of 8 points in the MSIS-29 is clinically significant.
- EDSS, Expanded Disability Status Scale
- ES, effect sizes
- MS, multiple sclerosis
- MSFC, Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite
- MSIS, Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale
- QoL, quality of life
- ROC, receiver operating characteristic
Footnotes
-
Published Online First 1 March 2007
-
Competing interests: None.







