Background: Ulnar nerve neuropathy is one of the most common entrapment neuropathies and is often considered to be one entity in clinical and follow-up studies.
Objective: The aim of this study was to determine whether there is a difference in the long term outcome of patients with a severe motor conduction block (mCB) of ⩾50% (50% group) in comparison with patients with an mCB of ⩽20% (20% group).
Methods: In a prospective cohort of 244 patients with ulnar neuropathy at the elbow (UNE), 16% had an mCB of ⩾50%. These patients were matched with respect to surgery, age and severity of muscle weakness with patients with an mCB of ⩽20%. 32 patients per group were evaluated clinically and electrophysiologically.
Results: The median follow-up period was 25 months. Based on the patient’s assessment, 26 (81%) patients in the 50% group and 14 (44%) patients in the 20% group had a good outcome (p = 0.005). The clinical examination showed a good outcome in 27 (84%) in the 50% group and in 13 (41%) in the 20% group (p = 0.0008).
Conclusion: This study showed that the prognosis of patients with focal demyelination of the ulnar nerve presenting with an mCB of ⩾50% is more favourable than those without an mCB.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Competing interests: None declared.
Ethics approval: The study was approved by the local medical ethics committee.
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.