Article Text

PDF
Serial yes/no reliability after traumatic brain injury: implications regarding the operational criteria for emergence from the minimally conscious state
  1. R Nakase-Richardson1,2,
  2. S A Yablon1,2,
  3. M Sherer3,
  4. C C Evans1,2,
  5. T G Nick4
  1. 1
    Methodist Rehabilitation Center, Jackson, Mississippi, USA
  2. 2
    University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, Mississippi, USA
  3. 3
    Memorial Hermann/TIRR and Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
  4. 4
    Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center and University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
  1. Dr R Nakase-Richardson, Department of Neuropsychology Methodist Rehabilitation Center, 1350 East Woodrow Wilson Drive, Jackson, Mississippi 39216, USA; Nakase{at}aol.com

Abstract

Background: Published guidelines for defining the “minimally conscious state” (MCS) included behaviours that characterise emergence, specifically “reliable and consistent” functional interactive communication (accurate yes/no responding) and functional use of objects. Guidelines were developed by consensus because of the lack of empirical data to guide definitions. Criticism emerged that individuals with severely impaired cognition would have difficulty achieving the requisite threshold of accuracy and consistency proposed to demonstrate emergence from MCS.

Objective: To determine the utility of the operational threshold for emergence from post-traumatic MCS, by evaluating a measure of yes/no accuracy (Cognitive Test for Delirium, auditory processing subtest (CTD-AP).)

Methods: Prospective, consecutive cohort of responsive patients recovering from traumatic brain injury (TBI), including a subset meeting criteria for MCS at neurorehabilitation admission who improved and were able to undergo the study protocol. Participants were evaluated at least weekly, and given the CTD-AP to assess yes/no responding.

Results: Of the 1434 observations from 336 participants, 767 observations yielded inaccurate yes/no responses. 75 participants (22%) never attained consistently accurate yes/no responses at any time during their hospitalisation. Generalised estimating equations analysis revealed that confused participants were more likely to respond inaccurately to yes/no questions. Further, the subset of individuals who were in MCS on rehabilitation admission and improved, were also more likely to respond inaccurately to yes/no questions.

Conclusions: Consistent yes/no accuracy is uncommon among responsive patients in early recovery from TBI. These results suggest that the operational threshold for yes/no response accuracy as a diagnostic criterion for emergence from MCS should be revisited.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Footnotes

  • Funding: This study was supported by The TBI Model System of Mississippi Grant, funded by the National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research Grant #H133A020514.

  • Competing interests: None.

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.