rss
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 79:652-655 doi:10.1136/jnnp.2007.124677
  • Research paper

Using the presence of visual hallucinations to differentiate Parkinson’s disease from atypical parkinsonism

  1. D R Williams1,2,3,
  2. J D Warren4,
  3. A J Lees2,3
  1. 1
    Faculty of Medicine (Neurosciences), Monash University (Alfred Hospital Campus), Melbourne Australia
  2. 2
    Queen Square Brain Bank for Neurological Disorders, Institute of Neurology UCL, London, UK
  3. 3
    Reta Lila Weston Institute of Neurological Studies, UCL, London, UK
  4. 4
    Dementia Research Centre, Institute of Neurology UCL, London, UK
  1. Dr D R Williams, Neurosciences, Monash University (Alfred Hospital Campus), Commercial Rd, Melbourne 3004, Australia; david.williams{at}med.monash.edu.au
  • Received 10 May 2007
  • Revised 13 August 2007
  • Accepted 30 August 2007
  • Published Online First 14 September 2007

Abstract

Objectives: Visual hallucinations (VH) occur frequently in Parkinson’s disease (PD) and dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) and are much less common in other bradykinetic rigid syndromes. Pathological series suggest that the presence of VH is highly specific for Lewy body pathology. To address the issue of diagnosis in patients with parkinsonism, we developed instructions for a structured interview (Queen Square Visual Hallucination Inventory (QSVHI)), capable of rapidly screening for VH in the outpatient setting.

Methods: 181 consecutive patients from a specialist movement disorders clinic were tested (115 with PD, 23 with progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP), 9 with multiple system atrophy (MSA), 5 with vascular parkinsonism, 19 with unclassifiable parkinsonism (UP) and 8 others), and 15 selected patients from other clinics and 14 neurologically normal controls. The characteristics of hallucinators and non-hallucinators were compared and the sensitivity, specificity and predictive values of VH for a clinical diagnosis of PD calculated.

Results: Screening questions identified VH in only 38% of patients with PD. The QSVHI identified VH in 75% of patients with PD and 47% of those with UP. The specificity of VH identified by the QSVHI for PD was 91%, sensitivity was 62%, positive predictive value was 95% and negative predictive value was 48%.

Conclusions: The QSVHI appears to be a sensitive method for identifying VH in a movement disorders clinic. VH occurred predominantly in PD and very rarely in PSP and MSA. Among patients with unclassifiable or undetermined parkinsonism, the presence of VH should be considered a red flag for underlying Lewy body pathology.

Footnotes

  • Competing interests: None.

  • Ethics approval: The study was approved by the local research ethics committee.

Latest from Practical Neurology

Latest from Practical Neurology

Free sample
This recent issue is free to all users to allow everyone the opportunity to see the full scope and typical content of JNNP.
View free sample issue >>

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

  • BMJ Careers - Latest Neurology and Neurosurgery jobs

    Latest neurology and neurosurgery jobs