rss
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2008;79:678-685 doi:10.1136/jnnp.2006.111187
  • Research paper

Comparison of indices of traumatic brain injury severity: Glasgow Coma Scale, length of coma and post-traumatic amnesia

  1. M Sherer1,2,
  2. M A Struchen1,2,
  3. S A Yablon3,4,
  4. Y Wang5,
  5. T G Nick5,6
  1. 1
    Memorial Hermann|TIRR, Houston, Texas, USA
  2. 2
    Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
  3. 3
    Methodist Rehabilitation Center, Jackson, Mississippi, USA
  4. 4
    University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, Mississippi, USA
  5. 5
    Center for Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
  6. 6
    University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
  1. Dr M Sherer, Memorial Hermann|TIRR, Department of Research, 1333 Moursund, Houston, TX 77030, USA; Mark.Sherer{at}memorialhermann.org
  • Received 13 November 2006
  • Revised 6 September 2007
  • Accepted 28 September 2007
  • Published Online First 10 October 2007

Abstract

Background: Classification of traumatic brain injury (TBI) severity guides management and contributes to determination of prognosis. Common indicators of TBI severity include Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) scores, length of coma (LOC) and duration of post-traumatic amnesia (PTA).

Objective: To compare GCS, LOC and PTA by examining distributions and intercorrelations and develop multivariable linear regression models for estimating LOC and PTA duration.

Methods: Prospective study of 519 of 614 consecutive patients with TBI. Indices of TBI severity studied were GCS, LOC, PTA and PTA–LOC (the interval from return of command-following to return of orientation). Candidate predictor variables for estimation of LOC, PTA and PTA–LOC intervals were age, years of education, year of injury (before 1997 vs 1997 or later), GCS, LOC (for PTA and PTA–LOC), pupillary responsiveness, type of injury, CT pathology and intracranial operations.

Results: Although there was a severity/response relationship between GCS and LOC, PTA and PTA–LOC intervals, there was overlap in these intervals between GCS severity categories. Age, year of injury, GCS, pupillary responsiveness and CT pathology were predictive of LOC. Age, years of education, year of injury, GCS, LOC, pupillary responsiveness and intracranial operations were predictive of PTA duration. Age, years of education, year of injury, GCS, LOC and pupillary responsiveness were predictive of PTA–LOC. GCS and LOC effects were influenced by age.

Conclusions: Predictors for estimating LOC, PTA and PTA–LOC intervals were determined and simple equations were developed. These equations will be helpful to clinicians, researchers and those counselling family members of patients with TBI.

Footnotes

  • Funding: Department of Education, National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research TBI Model Systems grants to Methodist Rehabilitation Center (H133A020514) and Memorial Hermann|TIRR (H133A70015).

  • Competing interests: None.

This Article

  1. Abstract
  2. Full text
  3. PDF
  4. All versions of this article:
    1. jnnp.2006.111187v1
    2. jnnp.2006.111187v2
    3. 79/6/678 most recent

Responses

  1. Submit a response
  2. No responses published

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

BMJ Careers - Latest neurology and neurosurgery jobs