rss
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2008;79:852 doi:10.1136/jnnp.2008.144188
  • Editorial commentary

A triumph of hope and expediency over experience and reason?

  1. Nicolas U Weir1,
  2. Martin S Dennis2
  1. 1
    Foothills Hospital, Calgary, Canada
  2. 2
    Division of Clinical Neurosciences, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
  1. N U Weir

    The practice of using outcomes data to indicate the quality of hospital stroke services is based on the assumption that, provided adjustment is made for differences in the characteristics of patients admitted and the play of chance, then most of the residual variation is likely to reflect differences in the quality of care. The paper by Lingsma1 and colleagues, published in this issue of J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry (see page 888), helps to show the extent to which this thinking is wrong and ultimately unhelpful in driving forward improvements in stroke care.

    The study tested an idealised system of comparing the outcomes of patients admitted to 10 Dutch hospitals and …

    [Full text of this article]

    This Article

    1. Extract
    2. Full text
    3. PDF

    Responses

    1. Submit a response
    2. No responses published

    Register for free content

    The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

    Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

    BMJ Careers - Latest neurology and neurosurgery jobs