rss
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2009;80:1120-1124 doi:10.1136/jnnp.2008.163386
  • Research paper

Evaluation of prednisolone treatment in the acute phase of neuralgic amyotrophy: an observational study

  1. J J J van Eijk1,
  2. N van Alfen1,2,
  3. M Berrevoets1,
  4. G J van der Wilt3,
  5. S Pillen2,
  6. B G M van Engelen1
  1. 1
    Department of Neurology, Neuromuscular Centre Nijmegen, Donders Centre for Neuroscience, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
  2. 2
    Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
  3. 3
    Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Health Technology Assessment, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
  1. Correspondence to Dr J J J van Eijk, 935 Department of Neurology, Neuromuscular Centre Nijmegen, Donders Centre for Neuroscience, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands; j.vaneijk{at}neuro.umcn.nl
  • Received 23 September 2008
  • Revised 20 February 2009
  • Accepted 20 February 2009
  • Published Online First 24 March 2009

Abstract

Background: Effective treatment for neuralgic amyotrophy (NA), a disabling brachial plexus syndrome of supposed immunomediated origin, is currently lacking. Given the circumstantial evidence of a beneficial effect of prednisolone on pain and paresis, this report evaluates the effects of prednisolone treatment administered in the acute phase in a retrospective case series of 50 NA patients.

Methods: Baseline variables (eg, age, sex, type of NA and number of attacks), treatment variables (eg, time until treatment, regimen and use of analgesics) and outcome measures (eg, duration and severity of pain, time course and severity of paresis and functional outcome) were statistically analysed and compared with a historical control group of 203 untreated NA patients.

Results: The baseline characteristics of the two patient groups were comparable. The median time until initial pain relief was lower in the study group (12.5 days vs 20.5 days), and a significantly higher percentage already recovered strength in the first month of treatment (18% vs 6.3%; p = 0.011). Twelve per cent had fully recovered within 1 year, while this was 1% for the controls (p<0.001), with the proportion reporting a “good” 12-month outcome also being higher (44% vs 10.7%; p<0.001). Side effects were reported by 20%, but none led to a discontinuation of treatment.

Conclusion: Oral prednisolone seems effective in the acute phase of neuralgic amyotrophy with the current results supporting previous case reports. A regimen of oral prednisolone is therefore recommended in the acute phase of the syndrome pending a prospective, randomised trial verifying the results obtained.

Footnotes

  • Competing interests None.

  • Ethics approval Ethics approval was provided by CCMO Arnhem/Nijmegen.

  • Provenance and Peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

Register for free content


Free trial
Individuals may register for a free 60 day online trial to all content.

Free archive
The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

BMJ Careers - Latest neurology and neurosurgery jobs