rss
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2009;80:1212-1217 doi:10.1136/jnnp.2008.155739
  • Research paper

Natural history of neuromuscular properties after stroke: a longitudinal study

  1. M M Mirbagheri1,2,
  2. C Tsao1,
  3. W Z Rymer1,2
  1. 1
    Sensory Motor Performance Program, Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
  2. 2
    Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA
  1. Correspondence to Dr M M Mirbagheri, Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago/Northwestern University, 345 E Superior Street, Suite 1408, Chicago, IL 60611, USA; Mehdi{at}northwestern.edu
  • Received 11 June 2008
  • Revised 21 October 2008
  • Accepted 24 October 2008
  • Published Online First 5 December 2008

Abstract

Background: A rigorous description of the time course of changes in neuromuscular properties after stroke may help us to understand the mechanisms underlying major motor impairments, and it will also help us track the efficacy of rehabilitation treatments. Such time course data have not been collected to date, primarily because of the lack of accurate tools for separating muscular and neural functional measures.

Objective: To characterise the time course of changes in elbow neuromuscular properties in hemiparetic stroke survivors over a 1 year period.

Methods: Using a system identification technique based on mechanical perturbations of elbow angle, we estimated intrinsic mechanical properties of muscles and stretch reflex parameters at 1, 2, 3, 6 and 12 months after stroke, at different mean elbow joint angles.

Results: There were substantial and progressive changes in intrinsic and reflex stiffness in paretic elbow muscles, at all five selected time points, and over a range of mean joint angles. Two temporal patterns of change in these neuromuscular properties were identified. In the first, intrinsic and reflex stiffness increased continuously after the stroke while in the second, intrinsic stiffness decreased continuously over this 12 month interval.

Conclusions: These different recovery patterns may reflect the emergence of two simultaneous but potentially opposing mechanisms; brain recovery and changes in peripheral neuromuscular properties. One consequence is that global joint stiffness measures may be misleading as opposing contributions from intrinsic and reflex neuromuscular subcomponents may confound our interpretation of the mean joint stiffness estimates.

Footnotes

  • Funding This research was supported by the American Heart Association (AHA-SDG), the National Institutes of Health (NIH-R21) and the National Science Foundation (NSF) awards to MMM.

  • Competing interests None.

  • Ethics approval The study was approved by Northwestern University.

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

BMJ Careers - Latest neurology and neurosurgery jobs