rss
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2009;80:689-692 doi:10.1136/jnnp.2008.145458
  • Short report

Intravenous levetiracetam: a new treatment alternative for refractory status epilepticus

  1. G Möddel1,
  2. S Bunten2,
  3. C Dobis3,
  4. S Kovac1,
  5. M Dogan1,
  6. M Fischera1,
  7. R Dziewas1,
  8. W-R Schäbitz1,
  9. S Evers1,
  10. S Happe2
  1. 1
    Department of Neurology, University of Münster, Münster, Germany
  2. 2
    Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, Klinikum Bremen-Ost/University of Göttingen, Bremen, Germany
  3. 3
    Department of Neurology, St Marien-Hospital, Lünen, Germany
  1. Dr G Möddel, Department of Neurology, University of Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Strasse 33, 48129 Münster, Germany; moddel{at}uni-muenster.de
  • Received 24 January 2008
  • Revised 19 August 2008
  • Accepted 1 September 2008

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the safety and efficacy of intravenous levetiracetam (LEV-iv) in refractory status epilepticus (SE). A retrospective chart review was performed on patients who received LEV-iv for treatment of SE (n = 36) and had failed at least one other antiepileptic drug. LEV-iv (median 3000 mg/day; range 1000–9000) was administered as a bolus loading (500–2000 mg per 30–60 min, n = 30) or as a continuous pump infusion (n = 6). SE was terminated in 69% (“responders”); 31% (“non-responders”) remained in SE. Factors associated with failure were: dose escalation over 3000 mg/day, lack of bolus loading, treatment latency over 48 h, age over 80 years, non-convulsive SE with coma (“subtle SE”), periodic lateralised epileptiform discharges (PLEDs) on EEG, acute cerebral lesion and intubation narcosis. SE was terminated in all eight patients without brain lesion (p = 0.033), and in all seven patients with complex partial SE (p = 0.051). Outcome was favourable (ambulatory patients) in 48% (responders) compared with 0% (non-responders), and “adverse” (death or continuing coma/stupor) in 24% (responders) compared with 100% (non-responders). Mortality was 17% (responders 4%, non-responders 45%). No patient had cardiocirculatory side effects or worsening of SE. Two patients experienced nausea and vomiting during LEV-iv loading, leading to aspiration pneumonia in one. This study suggests that LEV-iv may be a safe and efficacious treatment of SE. Prospective and controlled trials are imperative to confirm these preliminary findings.

Footnotes

  • Competing interests: None.

Responses to this article

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

BMJ Careers - Latest neurology and neurosurgery jobs