rss
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2009;80:871-875 doi:10.1136/jnnp.2008.167924
  • Research paper

A systematic review of delays in seeking medical attention after transient ischaemic attack

  1. N Sprigg1,
  2. C Machili1,
  3. M E Otter2,
  4. A Wilson3,
  5. T G Robinson1
  1. 1
    Ageing and Stroke Medicine, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
  2. 2
    Trent Research and Development Support Unit, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
  3. 3
    Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
  1. Dr N Sprigg, Ageing and Stroke Medicine Group, University of Leicester, Leicester General Hospital, Leicester LE5 4PW, UK; ns208{at}le.ac.uk
  • Received 12 November 2008
  • Revised 2 February 2009
  • Accepted 25 February 2009
  • Published Online First 8 March 2009

Abstract

Background: Prompt assessment and investigation of transient ischaemic attack (TIA) followed by early initiation of secondary prevention is effective in reducing recurrent stroke. Nevertheless, many patients are slow to seek medical advice after TIA. A systematic review was undertaken to examine potential factors associated with delay in seeking medical review after TIA.

Methods: The electronic databases MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Science Citation Index were searched for observational studies assessing patient delay in presentation after TIA. The search was restricted to studies published between December 1995 and September 2008.

Results: The electronic search yielded nine studies with data on presentation delay in patients with TIA; variations existed in study size, population and methodology. One study included patients with TIA only (n = 241), whereas the remaining eight studies recruited both stroke and TIA patients. Overall, TIA patients (n = 821) made up only a small proportion of the total number of patients in this analysis (n = 3,202). Length of delay varied greatly across all studies. In most studies, patients with TIA who attended an emergency department arrived there within hours. Where patients first presented to their general practitioner, 50% attended within 24 hours whereas 25% waited 2 days or more. Recognition of symptoms as stroke/TIA did not reduce the delay.

Conclusions: The majority of delay in seeking assessment after TIA is due to a lack of response by the patient—many patients do not recognise the symptoms of stroke/TIA, and even when they do, many fail to seek emergency medical attention. The public needs educating on the importance of contacting the emergency medical services or attending an emergency department immediately after TIA.

Footnotes

  • Competing interests: AW and TGR are investigators on the Barriers to the Early Assessment of TIA and Stroke (BEATS) project, funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR Grant PB-PG 0906-10335).

This Article

  1. Abstract
  2. Full text
  3. PDF
  4. All versions of this article:
    1. jnnp.2008.167924v1
    2. 80/8/871 most recent

Responses

  1. Submit a response
  2. No responses published

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

BMJ Careers - Latest neurology and neurosurgery jobs