rss
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 80:1044-1046 doi:10.1136/jnnp.2008.156356
  • Short report

Improved outcome after lumbar microdiscectomy in patients shown their excised disc fragments: a prospective, double blind, randomised, controlled trial

  1. M J Tait,
  2. J Levy,
  3. M Nowell,
  4. C Pocock,
  5. V Petrik,
  6. B A Bell,
  7. M C Papadopoulos
  1. Academic Neurosurgery Unit, St George’s University of London, London, UK
  1. Correspondence to Dr M C Papadopoulos, Academic Neurosurgery Unit, Room 1.122, 1st Floor Jenner Wing, St George’s, University of London, Cranmer Terrace, Tooting, London SW17 0RE, UK; mpapadop{at}sgul.ac.uk
  • Received 20 June 2008
  • Revised 18 September 2008
  • Accepted 1 October 2008

Abstract

Background: Lumbar microdiscectomy (LMD) is a commonly performed neurosurgical procedure. We set up a prospective, double blind, randomised, controlled trial to test the hypothesis that presenting the removed disc material to patients after LMD improves patient outcome.

Methods: Adult patients undergoing LMD for radiculopathy caused by a prolapsed intervertebral disc were randomised into one of two groups, termed experimental and control. Patients in the experimental group were given their removed disc fragments whereas patients in the control group were not. Patients were unaware of the trial hypothesis and investigators were blinded to patient group allocation. Outcome was assessed between 3 and 6 months after LMD. Primary outcome measures were the degree of improvement in sciatica and back pain reported by the patients. Secondary outcome measures were the degree of improvement in leg weakness, paraesthesia, numbness, walking distance and use of analgesia reported by the patients.

Results: Data from 38 patients in the experimental group and 36 patients in the control group were analysed. The two groups were matched for age, sex and preoperative symptoms. More patients in the experimental compared with the control group reported improvements in leg pain (91.5 vs 80.4%; p<0.05), back pain (86.1 vs 75.0%; p<0.05), limb weakness (90.5 vs 56.3%; p<0.02), paraesthesia (88 vs 61.9%; p<0.05) and reduced analgesic use (92.1 vs 69.4%; p<0.02) than preoperatively.

Conclusion: Presentation of excised disc fragments is a cheap and effective way to improve outcome after LMD.

Footnotes

  • Funding Funded by a Research Fellowship from the Royal College of Surgeons of England (MJT) and the Neurosciences Research Foundation (MJT, BAB, MCP).

  • Competing interests None.

  • Ethics approval The study was approved by West Kent LREC, Kent UK, by St George’s R&D Committee.

Latest from Practical Neurology

Latest from Practical Neurology

Free sample
This recent issue is free to all users to allow everyone the opportunity to see the full scope and typical content of JNNP.
View free sample issue >>

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

BMJ Careers - Latest Neurology and Neurosurgery jobs

Latest neurology and neurosurgery jobs