Article Text

PDF
Symposium on disorders of memory
008 Neuropsychological advances in our understanding and classification of the dementias
  1. J Snowden

    Author information: Julie Snowden is consultant neuropsychologist at Greater Manchester Neuroscience Centre, Salford Royal Foundation Trust and honorary reader in the University of Manchester. In 1980 Dr Snowden worked with Professor David Neary to establish the Cerebral Function Unit, a multidisciplinary, specialist diagnostic unit for early onset dementias, initially located at Manchester Royal Infirmary and now at Salford Royal Foundation Trust. The Unit receives tertiary referrals from neurologists and especially psychiatrists from across the North West region and beyond for advice on diagnosis and management of dementia patients. Dr Snowden's research interests lie in the cognitive and behavioural consequences of degenerative brain disease. She has contributed to the characterisation of focal dementia syndromes: frontotemporal dementia, semantic dementia and progressive aphasia, and her research group in Manchester has played a major role in the discovery of τ and progranulin genes associated with frontotemporal dementia and progressive aphasia. She has co-authored a monograph on Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration (1996), and published more than 150 papers and book chapters relating to dementia. She is on the editorial board of Neuropsychologia, and is a member of the British and International Neuropsychological Societies, the British Neuropsychiatry Association, the Memory Disorders Research Society and the World Federation of Neurology research group into Aphasia and Cognitive Disorders. Dr Snowden was a director of the British Neuropsychiatry Association from 2001 to 2004.

Abstract

Abstract: The traditional conception of dementia is of a global impairment of intellect. A logical inference is that the dementia associated with distinct pathologies ought not to be differentiable on neuropsychological grounds. Yet, it is now clear that dementia comprises highly distinct profiles of cognitive and behavioural change, reflecting differences in the topographical distribution of cerebral pathology. These characteristic cognitive profiles can predict the nature of the underlying histopathology with a high degree of accuracy. In this talk I discuss neuropsychological profiling in Alzheimer's disease and other major forms of degenerative dementia, making reference to memory as well as to the cognitive domains of language, perception, spatial skills and executive functions and to behaviour and affect. I highlight the potential pitfalls in interpreting neuropsychological test data, which are particularly pertinent in the context of the dementias and which have clouded evaluation of dementia in the past. I show that there is no one-to-one correspondence between a neuropsychological test and a cognitive function or brain location and tests can potentially be failed for diverse reasons. I demonstrate the importance of examining test performance in the light of other tests and taking account of qualitative performance characteristics. I discuss phenotypic variation within Alzheimer's disease and its relationship to APOE status, and the neuropsychology of “focal” dementia syndromes, particularly frontotemporal dementia, semantic dementia and progressive aphasia. I show that the neuropsychological characteristics of patients can separate focal presentations of Alzheimer's disease from non-Alzheimer frontotemporal lobar degeneration. Moreover, neuropsychological phenotype has strong predictive value too in distinguishing τ from τ-negative, ubiquitin-positive histology, and even in separating sub-classes of ubiquitin histopathology. A prevailing assumption is that neuropathology provides the “gold-standard” for classification and understanding of disease. Yet, classification depends too on knowledge of the relationships between pathology and its clinical manifestation. Neuropsychology can play a crucial role in increasing understanding of the neurobiology of degenerative brain disorders and in the classification of the dementias. I conclude that dementia can best be regarded as a constellation of deficits, with patients showing both strengths (areas of relative preservation of function) as well as weaknesses. Different pathologies are associated with distinct and characteristic forms of dementia. The notion of dementia as generalised intellectual impairment should be abandoned.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.