Objective To examine the predictive value of central atrophy in early multiple sclerosis (MS) patients, for medium term clinical outcome.
Methods In 54 patients with recently diagnosed MS, clinical and MRI parameters were obtained at baseline, and after 2 and 5.5 years of follow-up. In addition to conventional MRI parameters and the annualised percentage brain volume change (aPBVC), the annualised percentage ventricular volume change (aPVVC) was quantified. Main outcome measure was disease progression, defined by an increase in Expanded Disability Status Scale of ≥1 after 5.5 years.
Results Disease progression occurred in 29 patients. aPVVC within the first two years was significantly higher in these progressing patients (median 4.76%; IQR 3.05–9.17) compared with stable patients (median 3.23%; IQR −0.1–6.02) (p=0.02). A logistic regression model selected aPVVC within the first 2 years as the only MRI marker predicting progression after 5.5 years (OR 1.17, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.35). When entering all MRI and clinical markers, again aPVVC within the first 2 years was the only MRI marker selected. While aPVVC was correlated between the two consecutive time intervals (ρ=0.41, p<0.01), aPBVC was not. Furthermore, baseline T2 lesion load and gadolinium enhancing lesion load were correlated with aPVVC in the second time interval (2–5.5 years) but not with aPBVC.
Conclusion The rate of ventricular enlargement seems to be even more strongly predictive of disease progression after medium term follow-up than whole brain atrophy rate, and also outperforms lesion measures. Central atrophy rate could therefore be an important prognostic marker, especially in the early stages of MS.
- MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Funding CL was supported by a research grant form Bayer Schering, Germany. The MS Centre Amsterdam, and BM and HV were financially supported by the Dutch MS Research Foundation, The Netherlands (grant Nos 02-358b and 05-358c). The funders of the study had no role in the study design, data collection, data analysis, data interpretation or writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to submit the paper for publication.
Competing interests None.
Ethics approval This study was conducted with the approval of the institutional medical ethics committee of the VU, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.