Mitoxantrone prior to interferon beta-1b in aggressive relapsing multiple sclerosis: a 3-year randomised trial
- G Edan1,2,3,
- G Comi4,5,
- E Le Page1,2,
- E Leray2,3,
- M A Rocca5,6,
- M Filippi5,6,
- for The French–Italian Mitoxantrone Interferon-beta-1b Trial Group*
- 1Department of Neurology, University Hôpital Pontchaillou, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, Service de Neurologie, Rennes, France
- 2Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, CIC 0203, Hôpital Pontchaillou, Rennes, France
- 3Université Européenne de Bretagne, Université de Rennes 1, Faculté de médecine, Rennes, France
- 4Department of Neurology, University Hospital San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
- 5Division of Neuroscience, University Vita-Salute, Institute of Experimental Neurology, Milan, Italy
- 6Neuroimaging Research Unit, University Hospital San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
- Correspondence to Professor Gilles Edan, Service de Neurologie, CHU Pontchaillou, Rennes cedex 35033, France; gilles.edan{at}chu-rennes.fr
- Received 10 September 2010
- Revised 23 February 2011
- Accepted 1 March 2011
- Published Online First 24 March 2011
Abstract
Objectives The long-term impact of interferon-beta-1b (IFN) might be improved by short-term immunosuppression with mitoxantrone (MITOX) in aggressive relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (ARMS) patients.
Methods In this 3-year clinical and MRI study, 109 ARMS patients (two or more relapses in the previous 12 months and one or more gadolinium (Gd)-enhancing MRI lesion) were randomised into two groups: 54 patients received MITOX monthly (12 mg/m2; maximum 20 mg) combined with 1 g of methylprednisolone (MP) for 6 months followed by IFN for the last 27 months, and 55 patients received IFN for 3 years combined with 1 g of MP monthly for the first 6 months. The primary endpoint was the time to worsen by at least one Expanded Disability Status Scale point confirmed at 3 months.
Results The time to worsen by at least one Expanded Disability Status Scale point confirmed at 3 months was delayed by 18 months in the MITOX group compared with the IFN group (p<0.012). The 3-year risk of worsening disability was reduced by 65% in the MITOX group relative to the IFN group (11.8% vs 33.6%). MITOX patients had a reduced relapse rate by 61.7%, a reduced number of Gd-enhancing lesions at month 9 and a slower accumulation of new T2 lesions at each time point.
Conclusions Although there were limitations in this investigator–academic-driven study, the data do suggest that mitoxantrone induction therapy prior to INF beta-1b may have a role in aggressive disease.
- Aggressive relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis
- mitoxantrone
- interferon beta-1b
- disability
- MRI
- multiple sclerosis
Footnotes
-
↵* For the list of co-investigators in The French—Italian Mitoxantrone Interferon-beta-1b Trial Group see the end of the paper
-
Funding Supported by an academic grant (Programme Hospitalier de Recherche Clinique, from the French Health Ministry), with additional grants from industry (Bayer-Schering, Lederle and Immunex). GE has received research support and compensation as a speaker from Biogen Idec, Serono and Sanofi-Aventis, Bayer Schering Pharma AG, LFB, and has acted as a consultant for Teva Pharmaceuticals, Merck-Serono, Bayer-Schering, Biogenidec, and LFB. GC has received consulting fees from Novartis, Teva Pharmaceuticals, Sanofi-Aventis, Merck Serono and Bayer Schering, and lecture fees from Novartis, Teva Pharmaceuticals, Sanofi-Aventis, Merck Serono, Biogen-Dompe and Bayer Schering. ELP has received compensation as a speaker from Biogen Idec, Serono, Sanofi-Aventis and Bayer Schering Pharma AG. MF has received research support and compensation as a speaker from Teva Pharmaceuticals, Merck-Serono, Bayer-Schering, Biogen-Dompe and Genmab, and has acted as a consultant for Teva Pharmaceuticals, Merck-Serono, Bayer-Schering, Biogen-Dompe and Genmab.
-
Competing interests None.
-
Patient consent Obtained.
-
Ethics approval Ethics approval was provided by the Centre de Protection des Personnes pour la Recherche Biomédicale Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Rennes.
-
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.








