Background The focal primary torsion dystonias (FPTDs) form a group of clinical heterogeneous syndromes and can be considered a genetic complex disease; it is thought to be primed by genetic variants with variable impact and triggered by non-genetic factors. Thorough clinical description of FPTDs cohorts is sparse but essential for further progress in genetic research.
Objective To establish suggested relations between age at onset (AaO), site and family history in a large focal dystonias cohort and gain more insight into familial clustering for genetic research.
Patients and methods A prospective cohort study between March 2008 and March 2011, including 676 FPTD patients attending the botulinum toxin outpatient clinics of six Dutch movement disorder centres.
Results and conclusions Of all of the FPTD patients, 25% had a familial predisposition; in 2.4% a Mendelian inheritance pattern was noted. With a stronger family history, a significantly lower AaO was seen in all focal dystonias. In both the sporadic and familial focal dystonia groups, AaO had an effect on the distribution of dystonia, with a caudal to cranial tendency. In all focal dystonia forms, women were more frequently affected, except for writer's cramp. Careful clinical characterisation will allow the formation of phenotype subgroups. We suggest that genetic research into FPTDs will benefit from this approach and discuss genetic research strategies to decipher the complex background of focal dystonias.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Funding JLG is supported by AMC Graduate School Scholarship and Prinses Beatrix Fund. BPCvdW received research grants from the Princess Beatrix Fund; the Brain Foundation; the European Union (6th Framework program, EuroSCA/LSHM-CT-2004-503304, Brussels); and Ipsen Pharmaceuticals. JJvH is supported by a Dutch government grant (BSIK03016). CK is supported by a career development award from the Hermann and Lilly Schilling Foundation. MAJdK-T received research support from the Prinses Beatrix Fund and a grant from The Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development (VIDI research grant #016.056.333). This work was supported by Prinses Beatrix Fund grant No WAR 2008-55.
Competing interests None.
Ethics approval Ethics approval was provided by the medical ethical committees of AMC, MCAlkmaar, Erasmus MC, UMCN and LUMC.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.