Article info

Download PDFPDF
Letter
How reliable is repeated testing for hemispatial neglect? Implications for clinical follow-up and treatment trials

Authors

  • Björn Machner 1National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, UCL Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience and Institute of Neurology, Queen Square, London, UK2Department of Neurology, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany PubMed articlesGoogle scholar articles
  • Yee-Haur Mah 1National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, UCL Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience and Institute of Neurology, Queen Square, London, UK PubMed articlesGoogle scholar articles
  • Nikos Gorgoraptis 1National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, UCL Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience and Institute of Neurology, Queen Square, London, UK PubMed articlesGoogle scholar articles
  • Masud Husain 1National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, UCL Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience and Institute of Neurology, Queen Square, London, UK PubMed articlesGoogle scholar articles
  1. Correspondence to Dr Björn Machner, Department of Neurology, University of Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, D-23538 Lübeck, Germany; bjoern.machner{at}neuro.uni-luebeck.de
View Full Text

Citation

Machner B, Mah Y, Gorgoraptis N, et al
How reliable is repeated testing for hemispatial neglect? Implications for clinical follow-up and treatment trials

Publication history

  • Received May 23, 2012
  • Revised July 19, 2012
  • Accepted August 1, 2012
  • First published August 25, 2012.
Online issue publication 
April 13, 2016

Article Versions

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.