Article Text

PDF
Research paper
Long term follow-up of deep brain stimulation of the caudal zona incerta for essential tremor
  1. Anders Fytagoridis1,2,
  2. Ulrika Sandvik1,
  3. Mattias Åström3,
  4. Tommy Bergenheim1,
  5. Patric Blomstedt1
  1. 1Department of Pharmacology and Clinical Neuroscience, Section of Neurosurgery, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
  2. 2Department of Neurosurgery, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
  3. 3Department of Biomedical Engineering, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
  1. Correspondence to Dr A Fytagoridis, Department of Neurosurgery, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, SE-171 76, Stockholm, Sweden; anders.fytagoridis{at}neuro.umu.se

Abstract

Purpose The ventral intermediate nucleus of thalamus is the standard target for deep brain stimulation (DBS) in essential tremor (ET). However, favourable data have recently highlighted the caudal zona incerta (cZi) as an alternative target. Reports concerning the long-term results are however lacking, and we have therefore evaluated the long-term effects in our patients with ET and cZi DBS.

Methods 18 patients were evaluated using the Essential Tremor Rating Scale (ETRS) before and on-/off-stimulation at 1 and 3–5 years after surgery (mean 48.5±10.6 months). Two patients were operated on bilaterally but all electrodes were evaluated separately. The stimulation parameters were recorded and the stimulation strength calculated.

Results A baseline total ETRS mean score of 46.0 decreased to 21.9 (52.4%) at the final evaluation. On the treated side, tremor of the upper extremity (item 5 or 6) improved from 6.1 to 0.5 (91.8%) and hand function (items 11–14) improved from 9.3 to 2.0 (78.0%). Activities of daily living improved by 65.8%. There was no increase in stimulation strength over time.

Conclusion cZi DBS is a safe and effective treatment for the long term suppression of ET.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Footnotes

  • Funding This work was supported by funding from Umeå University and the Foundation for Clinical Neuroscience at the University Hospital of Umeå.

  • Competing interests None.

  • Ethics approval The study was approved by the ethics board at the University Hospital of Umeå (04-123M).

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.