Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Letter
Digit span: a comparison of Chinese versus alphabetic language speakers in dysexecutive dementia patients
  1. Simon Kang Seng Ting1,2,
  2. Shahul Hameed1,2,
  3. Eng-King Tan1,2,
  4. Christopher Gabriel1,
  5. Kinjal Doshi1
  1. 1Department of Neurology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
  2. 2National Neuroscience Institute, Singapore
  1. Correspondence to Dr Simon Kang Seng Ting, Singapore General Hospital, Outram Road, Singapore 169608, Singapore; simon.ting.k.s{at}sgh.com.sg

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Introduction

Attention span tasks are standardised neuropsychological tools that measure verbal and visual working memory. Forward digit span (FDS) measures verbal short-term storage capacity or the phonological loop. On the other hand, backward digit span (BDS) measures both temporary storage and capability to manipulate verbal information. Forward and backward visual memory spans (BVSs) measure similar indices for visuospatial information. These measures of visual and verbal aspects of working memory are based on the influential Baddeley model of working memory.1

Studies conducted in the past raise concerns regarding the variance in the performance on attention span tasks, particularly FDS, among different cultures or languages. The findings were attributed to articulation time involved in different languages.2 ,3 However, it has also been shown that performance on BDS is not related to language.2 ,3 Of note, these studies involved a comparison of two groups that were derived from distinct social backgrounds (eg, the USA and China, Hedden et al 2002). Furthermore, this effect has not yet been observed in patients suffering from neurodegenerative disorders. It is therefore important to address whether a common standardised norm derived from different language groups originating from one multicultural and multilingual society (eg, Singapore) will be adequate.

The purpose of this study was to address this issue by examining the performance on the FDS between Chinese-speaking and non-Chinese-speaking patients diagnosed with dementia and executive dysfunction in Singapore, …

View Full Text

Footnotes

  • Competing interests None.

  • Ethics approval SingHealth institutional review board.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.