Article Text

PDF
Letter
Abstracts presented at the Association of British Neurologists: what becomes of them and what is their impact?
  1. Sola Odunsi1,
  2. Christopher Kobylecki2,3,
  3. Matthew Jones2,3
  1. 1 North Manchester General Hospital, Manchester, UK
  2. 2 Department of Neurology, Greater Manchester Neurosciences Centre, Salford, UK
  3. 3 Institute of Brain, Behaviour and Mental Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
  1. Correspondence to Dr Matthew Jones, Department of Neurology, Greater Manchester Neurosciences Centre, Salford, M6 8HD UK; matthew.jones{at}manchester.ac.uk

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Publication in peer-reviewed journals of work presented in abstract form at clinical academic meetings is important, given that under-reporting of research findings may distort the published literature and constitute research misconduct.1 A systematic review suggests that only around 30% of abstracts submitted to biomedical meetings achieve publication.1 The fate of abstracts presented at neurology meetings in the UK, and factors associated with subsequent publication, have not to our knowledge been studied.

We performed a PubMed search of titles, first and last authors of abstracts presented at Association of British Neurologists (ABN) meetings between 2007 and 2009. An independent search of the abstracts from one ABN meeting showed excellent inter-rater reliability (Cohen's κ=0.870; p<0.0001). The …

View Full Text

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.