Article Text

PDF
062
M-ACE VERSUS MOCA: COMPARATIVE STUDY
  1. AJ Larner
  1. The Walton Centre

Abstract

Objective To compare diagnostic accuracy of the Mini-Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination (M-ACE) and Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) for diagnosis of dementia and mild cognitive impairment (MCI) in a cognitive disorders clinic.

Results Of 117 consecutive new referrals seen over 6 months (June-November 2015; F:M=49:68, 42% female; age range 27–89 years, median 60), 20 were diagnosed with dementia (DSM-IV-TR criteria), 34 with MCI (Petersen criteria). M-ACE and MoCA scores were highly correlated (0.86). Using cutoffs defined in index studies (M-ACE ≤25/30; MoCA <26/30), both M-ACE and MoCA were sensitive (>0.90) but not specific (<0.6) for dementia and MCI diagnosis. Area under ROC curve was >0.8 for both tests for both diagnoses. Effect size (Cohen's d) r was large for dementia (M-ACE 1.62; MoCA 1.91) and MCI diagnosis (M-ACE 1.12; MoCA 1.31). Weighted comparison suggested very small net loss for M-ACE vs MoCA for dementia diagnosis (−0.026; equivalent increase 4.4 extra patients diagnosed per 1000 screened using MoCA) and very small net benefit for M-ACE vs MoCA for MCI diagnosis (0.013; equivalent increase 4.6 extra patients diagnosed per 1000 screened using M-ACE).

Conclusions In this pragmatic study, M-ACE and MoCA showed comparable metrics for diagnosis of dementia and MCI.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.