Article Text

J5 Outcome in 25% at-risk individuals after presymptomatic testing for huntington’s disease
  1. Adeline Bonnard1,
  2. Ariane Herson1,
  3. Stephanie Staraci1,
  4. Marcela Gargiulo2,
  5. Alexandra Durr1,3
  1. 1APHP Department of Genetics, Groupe Hospitalier Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France
  2. 2Laboratoire de Psychologie Clinique et Psychopathologie, EA 4056, Université Paris Descartes, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Institut de Psychologie, Paris, France
  3. 3Institut du Cerveau et de la Moelle, INSERM U1127, CNRS UMR7225, Sorbonne Universités – UPMC Université Paris VI UMR_S1127, Paris, France


Background Testing for Huntington’s disease (HD) is usually restricted to individuals at 50% risk in whom the parent is diagnosed with HD. An individual at 25% risk requests testing with full knowledge that the transmiting parent does not want to know. International recommendations states that extreme care should be exercised when PT would provide information about another person who has not requested it.

Aims Since 1992, PT is offered in the Salpêtrière University Hospital in Paris. To i) compare outcome of 25% at risk individuals to those of 50%; ii) assess how test information was disclosed in the family and to the parent.

Methods We assessed information about pretest and post-test information including age, gender, parent status, motivation for testing, result of the PT and contacted 25% at risk individuals by phone and invited them for a semi-structured interview.

Results There were 1488 individuals at 50% risk and 159 at 25% who took the test between 1992 and 2016. Sixteen interviews in carriers and non carriers of the mutations were conducted, 5 lost to follow up. The mean time since testing request was similar in both groups [10.9 years ± 6.4 vs 11.4 years ± 6.5 p = 0.416]. 25% at risk were younger at first contact [30.7 ± 9.7 years (13–78) vs 35.1 ± 12.1 years (11–90), p < 0.001] and had less often children [42/153 (27%) vs 661/1437 (46 %), p = 0.001]. The 50% requested their result after multidisciplinary testing procedure more often than the 25% [1041/1488 (69.9%) vs 93/159 (58.5%), p = 0.001], and they were more often carriers of the mutation in HTT gene [42% (434/1041) vs 13% (12/93), p < 0.001].

Conclusions Our results showed significant differences between the 25% and 50% at risk groups. In case of an unfavourable result, “double knowledge” had major implications for future relations between child and parent. Psychological issues, particularly the impact to become a “messenger of bad news” for parents and siblings were amplified in that case.

  • Genetic counselling
  • presymptomatig testing
  • 25% at risk

Statistics from

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.