Objectives To analyse and describe the clinical and genetic spectrum of Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease (CMT) caused by mutations in the neurofilament light polypeptide gene (NEFL).
Methods Combined analysis of newly identified patients with NEFL-related CMT and all previously reported cases from the literature.
Results Five new unrelated patients with CMT carrying the NEFL mutations P8R and N98S and the novel variant L311P were identified. Combined data from these cases and 62 kindreds from the literature revealed four common mutations (P8R, P22S, N98S and E396K) and three mutational hotspots accounting for 37 (55%) and 50 (75%) kindreds, respectively. Eight patients had de novo mutations. Loss of large-myelinated fibres was a uniform feature in a total of 21 sural nerve biopsies and ‘onion bulb’ formations and/or thin myelin sheaths were observed in 14 (67%) of them. The neurophysiological phenotype was broad but most patients with E90K and N98S had upper limb motor conduction velocities <38 m/s. Age of onset was ≤3 years in 25 cases. Pyramidal tract signs were described in 13 patients and 7 patients were initially diagnosed with or tested for inherited ataxia. Patients with E90K and N98S frequently presented before age 3 years and developed hearing loss or other neurological features including ataxia and/or cerebellar atrophy on brain MRI.
Conclusions NEFL-related CMT is clinically and genetically heterogeneous. Based on this study, however, we propose mutational hotspots and relevant clinical–genetic associations that may be helpful in the evaluation of NEFL sequence variants and the differential diagnosis with other forms of CMT.
- charcot-Marie-Tooth disease
- neurofilament light polypeptide
- whole-exome sequencing.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Contributors AH was involved in the study design, the acquisition, analysis and interpretation of data and drafted the manuscript. ML, ZJ, NUJ, MAG, JMP, RP, JCB, Y-TL, SW, CB, MPTL, HM, MGH, SB and HH were involved in the acquisition and interpretation of data and reviewed the manuscript. SZ and MS were involved in the study design, acquisition and interpretation of data and reviewed the manuscript. MMR supervised the study and was involved in the study design, acquisition and interpretation of data and reviewed the manuscript. All authors approved the final manuscript.
Competing interests None declared.
Ethics approval National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery and UCL Institute of Neurology Ethics Committee and Institutional Review Board of the Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.