rss
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry doi:10.1136/jnnp.2007.126730

Ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (OVEMPs) in superior canal dehiscence

  1. Sally M Rosengren (s.rosengren{at}unsw.edu.au)
  1. UNSW Clinical School and Prince of Wales Medical Research Institute, Australia
    1. Swee T Aw (sweea{at}icn.usyd.edu.au)
    1. Neurology Department, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Australia
      1. G Michael Halmagyi (michael{at}icn.usyd.edu.au)
      1. Neurology Department, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Australia
        1. Neil P McAngus Todd (neil.todd{at}manchester.ac.uk)
        1. Faculty of Life Science, University of Manchester, United Kingdom
          1. James G Colebatch (j.colebatch{at}unsw.edu.au)
          1. UNSW Clinical School and Prince of Wales Medical Research Institute, Australia
            • Published Online First 31 August 2007

            Abstract

            Objective: Patients with superior canal dehiscence (SCD) have large sound-evoked vestibular reflexes with pathologically low threshold. We wished to determine whether a recently discovered measure of the vestibulo-ocular reflex, the ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potential (OVEMP), produces similar high amplitude, low threshold responses in SCD, and can differentiate SCD patients from normals. Methods: Nine patients with CT-confirmed SCD and 10 normal controls were stimulated with 500 Hz, 2 ms tone bursts and 0.1 ms clicks at intensities up to 142 dB peak SPL. Conventional VEMPs were recorded from the ipsilateral sternocleidomastoid muscle to determine threshold, and OVEMPs were recorded from electrode pairs placed superior and inferior to the eyes. Three-dimensional eye movements were measured with scleral dual-search coils. Results: In SCD patients OVEMP amplitudes were significantly larger than normal (P < 0.001) and thresholds were pathologically low. The n10 OVEMP in the contralateral inferior electrode became particularly large with increasing stimulus intensity (up to 25 μV) and with up-gaze (up to 40 μV). Sound-evoked (slow phase) eye movements were present in all SCD patients (vertical: upward; torsional: upper pole away from the affected side; and horizontal: towards or away from the affected side), but began only as the OVEMP response became maximal, consistent with the surface potentials being produced by activation of the extraocular muscles that generated the eye movements. Conclusions: OVEMP amplitude and threshold (particularly the contralateral inferior n10 response) differentiated SCD patients from normals. Our findings suggest that both the OVEMPs and induced eye movements in SCD are a result of intense saccular activation in addition to superior canal stimulation.

            Register for free content

            The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

            Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

            BMJ Careers - Latest neurology and neurosurgery jobs