Article Text

other Versions

PDF
Brain Penetration Effects of Microelectrodes and DBS Leads in STN or GPi
  1. Justin M Mann (jmann12{at}ufl.edu)
  1. University of Florida, Department of Neurology, Movement Disorders Center, United States
    1. Kelly D Foote (foote{at}neurosurgery.ufl.edu)
    1. University of Florida Movement Disorders Center, Department of Neurosurgery, United States
      1. Cynthia W Garvan (cgarvan{at}ufl.edu)
      1. University of Florida Department of Education, United States
        1. Hubert H Fernandez (fernandez{at}neurology.ufl.edu)
        1. University of Florida, United States
          1. Charles E Jacobson, I V (jacobson{at}neurology.ufl.edu)
          1. University of Florida, United States
            1. Ramon L Rodriguez (ramon.rodriguez{at}neurology.ufl.edu)
            1. University of Florida, United States
              1. Ihtsham Haq (ihtsham.haq{at}neurology.ufl.edu)
              1. University of Florida, United States
                1. Mustafa S Siddiqui (mssiddiq{at}wfubmc.edu)
                1. Wake Forest University, United States
                  1. Irene A Malaty (irene.halkias{at}neurology.ufl.edu)
                  1. University of Florida, United States
                    1. Takashi Morishita (takashi.m.md{at}gmail.com)
                    1. University of Florida, United States
                      1. Christopher J Hass (cjhass{at}hhp.ufl.edu)
                      1. University of Florida, United States
                        1. Michael S Okun (okun{at}neurology.ufl.edu)
                        1. University of Florida McKnight Brain Institute, Neurology and Neurosurgery, United States

                          Abstract

                          Objective: To determine how intraoperative microelectrode recordings (MER) and intraoperative lead placement influence symptoms and also whether target location (subthalamic nucleus (STN) or globus pallidus interna (GPi)) was important.

                          Background: Following MER and/or test stimulation there may be a resultant “collision/implantation or microlesion” effect, thought to result from disruption of cells and/or fibers within the penetrated region.

                          Methods: Forty-seven consecutive Parkinson disease patients undergoing unilateral DBS for PD (either STN or GPi DBS) were evaluated. Motor function was measured at six time points with a modified UPDRS: 1) preoperative (before penetration on the day of surgery), 2) immediately post- MER, 3) immediately post lead implantation/collision, 4) four months following surgery- off medications, on DBS (12 hour medication washout), 5) six months postoperative- off medication and off DBS (12 hour washout), and 6) six months- on medication and off DBS (12 hour washout).

                          Results: Significant improvements in motor scores (p<.05) (tremor, rigidity, bradykinesia) were observed as a result of MER and lead placement. The improvements were similar in magnitude to what was observed at four and six months post-DBS following programming and medication optimization. When washed out (medications and DBS) for twelve hours, UPDRS motor scores were still improved compared to preoperative testing. There was a larger improvement in STN when compared to GPi following MER (p<.05), and a trend for significance following lead placement (p<.08), however long-term outcome was similar.

                          Conclusion: This study demonstrated significant intraoperative penetration effects resulting from MER and lead placement/collion in PD.

                          Statistics from Altmetric.com

                          Request permissions

                          If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.