Article Text

other Versions

PDF

Editorial commentary
‘It’s the progression, doctor’: what patients with motor neurone disease really are interested in
  1. Julian Grosskreutz
  1. Correspondence to Dr Julian Grosskreutz, Hans Berger Department of Neurology, Jena University Hospital, Am Klinikum 1, Jena 07747, Germany; julian.grosskreutz{at}med.uni-jena.de

Statistics from Altmetric.com

To see a patient and recognise amyotrophic lateral sclerosis as the underlying cause of progressive, painless paralysis without sensory symptoms has been deemed easy, and indeed it is for physicians seeing patients with motor neuron disease on a regular basis. Answering patients’ questions of ‘How bad is it? What will happen to me? How long do I have?’ is however no mean feat; these questions invariably challenge the treating physician to perform a thorough assessment of the extent and the aggressiveness of the disease. While the Amyotrophic lateral sclerosisfunctional rating scale (ALSFRS-R) provides a quantitative measure of functional deficits, it does not follow a linear time course and has limited predictive capability compared to vital capacity.1

The individual causal mechanisms underlying ALS are largely unknown. Despite rapid advances associating more than 60 genes with ALS, few of these predict progression.2 Only recently, phosphorylyated neurofilament heavy chain and neurofilament light chain in corticospinal fluid and serum have been associated with disease load and progression,3 while postmortem studies have identified neuropathological stages of ALS as a progressive spread of pathology from the motor cortex to all monosynaptically connected areas of the brain.4 Yet none of these markers allow individual prediction of the disease course or the extent of extramotor involvement.

High-resolution MRI is now being increasingly used to identify pathology variants in different forms of ALS in vivo. In their JNNP paper, Senda and colleagues4 have performed state-of-the-art multimodal MRI in 67 patients with ALS consecutively seen in their clinic. They identified significant ALS-related changes in the brain that correlated with a more aggressive disease course as inferred by ALSFRS-R progression of 6 months after the initial scan. While this group analysis does not allow prognostication of disease progression on an individual basis, it provides a major step forward to answer that all pervading question of ‘What will happen to me?’ because most areas that were associated with a more aggressive disease course were extramotor brain areas. In contrast to ALSFRS-R and vital capacity, MRI allows the detection of the involvement of brain areas that have a significant impact on the patient's ability to fully comprehend the long-term implications of the ALS diagnosis. These may entail decisions on care modalities, of mobility and ventilatory support, with the latter allowing the patient to survive for a prolonged time period, in some cases beyond the ability to make an informed decision on continuation of ventilation.

In the future, MRI further developed to aid an individual assessment of the extent of extramotor brain involvement should assist physicians  to recognise a reduction in the patient's ability to make long-term decisions, something most patients would like to know about early in the course of ALS.4 5

References

View Abstract

Footnotes

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Provenance and peer review Commissioned; internally peer reviewed.

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Linked Articles

  • Neurodegeneration
    Joe Senda Naoki Atsuta Hirohisa Watanabe Epifanio Bagarinao Kazunori Imai Daichi Yokoi Yuichi Riku Michihito Masuda Ryoichi Nakamura Hazuki Watanabe Mizuki Ito Masahisa Katsuno Shinji Naganawa Gen Sobue