Article Text

Download PDFPDF
No benefit derived from repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in depression: a prospective, single centre, randomised, double blind, sham controlled “add on” trial
  1. A Hausmann1,
  2. G Kemmler1,
  3. M Walpoth1,
  4. S Mechtcheriakov1,
  5. K Kramer-Reinstadler1,
  6. T Lechner1,
  7. T Walch1,
  8. E A Deisenhammer1,
  9. M Kofler2,
  10. C I Rupp1,
  11. H Hinterhuber1,
  12. A Conca3
  1. 1University Hospital Innsbruck, Department of General Psychiatry, Innsbruck, Austria
  2. 2Hospital Hochzirl, Department of Neurology, Hochzirl, Austria
  3. 3Hospital Rankweil, Department of Psychiatry I, Rankweil, Austria
  1. Correspondence to:
 Dr A Hausmann
 University Hospital Innsbruck, Department of General Psychiatry, Laboratory for Magnetic Brain Stimulation, Anichstrasse 35, A-6020 Innsbruck; armand.hausmannuibk.ac.at

Abstract

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) has been reported to demonstrate slight effects in the treatment of depression. Hence, a novel bilateral versus unilateral and sham stimulation design was applied to further assess rTMS’ antidepressant effects.

Forty one medication free patients with major depression, admitted to a psychiatric unit specialising in affective disorders, were consecutively randomised into 3 groups. Group A1 (n = 12) received unilateral active stimulation consisting of high frequency (hf) rTMS over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (LDLPC) and subsequent sham low frequency (lf) rTMS over the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (RDLPC). Group A2 (n = 13) received simultaneous bilateral active stimulation consisting of hf-rTMS over the LDLPC and lf-rTMS over the RDLPC. Group C (n = 13) received bilateral sham stimulation. Stimulation was performed on 10 consecutive workdays. All patients received antidepressant medication on the first day of stimulation, which was continued during and after the stimulation period.

As no significant difference in antidepressant outcome between group A1 and A2 was found, the two groups were pooled. The time course of the outcome variables Hamilton depression rating scale (HDRS21) and Beck depression inventory (days 0, 7, 14, 28) by repeated measures analysis of variance revealed no significant group differences (in terms of a group by time interaction), whereas there was a significant effect of time on all three outcome variables in all groups. The results suggest that rTMS as an “add on” strategy, applied in a unilateral and a bilateral stimulation paradigm, does not exert an additional antidepressant effect.

  • add on therapy
  • antidepressant treatment
  • combination high frequency and low frequency rTMS
  • depression
  • prefrontal areas
  • outcome
  • repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation
  • BDI, Beck depression inventory
  • HDRS, Hamilton depression rating scale
  • hf-rTMS, high frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation
  • LDLPC, left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex
  • lf-rTMS, low frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation
  • MRI, magnetic resonance imaging
  • MT, motor threshold
  • RDLPC, right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex
  • rTMS, repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Footnotes

  • This paper was partly presented at the “Winterseminar für Biologische Psychiatrie” Oberlech, Austria, 19 March 2002.