Skip to main content
Log in

Cerebrospinal fluid outflow resistance measurements in the selection of patients for shunt surgery in the normal pressure hydrocephalus syndrome. A controlled trial

  • Clinical Articles
  • Published:
Acta Neurochirurgica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

In an attempt to determine to what extent the measurement of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) outflow resistance (Rout) can distinguish patients with normal-pressure hydrocephalus (NPH) who respond to shunt surgery from patients who fail to do so, the authors undertook a controlled trial. Eighteen patients with the diagnosis of NPH entered the study. In connection with the shunt operation all patients who entered the study underwent Rout measurement by means of the pressure-volume index (PVI) method of bolus manipulation (Marmarouet al.). As a safety measure patients above 70 of age and patients with dementia as the only clinical symptom underwent continuous intraventricular pressure measurement before they entered the final study.

As a result a total of fourteen patients underwent PVI test and shunt surgery during the same procedure. Patients with normal Rout thus served as controls, since all patients underwent shunt surgery irrespective of the result of the Rout measurement. Eight patients improved following surgery and the outcome did not correlate with result of PVI nor Rout determinations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Artru AA (1984) Effects of halothane and fentanyl anesthesia on resistance to reabsorption of CSF. J Neurosurg 60: 252–256

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Benvenuti D, Maiuri F, Lavano A, Volpentesta G, Giamundo A, Tecame S (1987) Postoperative intracerebral haemorrhages remote from the site of the initial operation. Br J Neurosurg 1: 377–384

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Black PM (1980) Idiopatic normal-pressure hydrocephalus. Results of shunting in 62 patients. J Neurosurg 52: 371–377

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. BØrgesen SE (1984) Conductance to outflow of CSF in normal-pressure hydrocephalus. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 71: 1–45

    Google Scholar 

  5. BØrgesen SE, Gjerris F (1982) The predictive value of conductance to outflow of CSF in normal pressure hydrocephalus. Brain 105: 65–86

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. BØrgesen SE, Gyldensted C, Gjerris F, Lester J (1980) Computed tomography and pneumoencephalography compared to conductance to outflow of CSF in normal pressure hydrocephalus. Neuroradiology 20: 17–22

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Chawla JG, Hulme A, Cooper R (1974) Intracranial pressure in patients with dementia and communicating hydrocephalus. J Neurosurg 40: 376–380

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Crockard HA, Hanlon K, Duda EE, Mullan JF (1977) Hydrocephalus as a cause of dementia: evaluation by computerized tomography and intracranial pressure monitoring. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 40: 736–740

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Graff-Radford NR, Godersky JC (1986) Normal-pressure hydrocephalus. Onset of gait abnormality before dementia predicts good surgical outcome. Arch Neurol 43: 940–942

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Gücer G, Viernstein L, Walker AE (1980) Continuous intracranial pressure recording in adult hydrocephalus. Surg Neurol 13: 323–328

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hartmann A, Alberti E: Differentiation of communication hydrocephalus and presenile dementia by continuous recording of cerebrospinal fluid pressure. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 40: 630–640

  12. Hughes CP, Siegel BA, Coxe WS, Gado MH, Grubb RL, Coleman RE, Berg L (1978) Adult idiopathic communicating hydrocephalus with and without shunting. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 41: 961–971

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kosteljanetz M (1985) Resistance to outflow of cerebrospinal fluid determined by bolus injection and constant rate infusion in humans. Neurosurgery 16: 336–340

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kosteljanetz M (1986) CSF dynamics and pressure-volume relationships in communicating hydrocephalus. J Neurosurg 64: 45–52

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kosteljanetz M (1987) Intracranial pressure: Cerebrospinal fluid dynamics and pressure-volume relations. Acta Neurol Scand [Suppl] 75: 1–23

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kosteljanetz M (1989) Measurement of resistance to outflow: The bolus injection method. In: Gjerris F, BØrgesen SE, Soelberg SØrensen P (eds) Outflow of cerebrospinal fluid. Alfred Benzon Symposium 27. Munksgaard, Copenhagen, pp 134–143

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kosteljanetz M (1989) Further analysis of the bolus-injection technique for resistance measurements. In: Hoff JT, Betz AL (eds) Intracranial pressure VII. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York Tokyo, pp 356–358

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kosteljanetz M, Ingstrup HM (1985) Normal pressure hydrocephalus, correlation between CT and measurements of cerebrospinal fluid dynamics. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 77: 8–13

    Google Scholar 

  19. Marmarou A, Shulman K, Rosende RM (1978) A nonlinear analysis of the cerebrospinal fluid system and intracranial pressure dynamics. J Neurosurg 48: 332–344

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Schmidt JF, Fedders O, BØrgesen SE, Gjerris F (1989) Reproducibility of measurements of resistance to CSF outflow. In: Gjerris F, BØrgesen SE, Soelberg SØrensen P (eds) Outflow of cerebrospinal fluid. Alfred Benzon symposium 27. Munksgaard, Copenhagen, pp 224–229

    Google Scholar 

  21. Shapiro K, Marmarou A, Shulman K (1980) Characterisation of clinical CSF dynamics and neural axis compliance using the pressure-volume index: I. The normal pressure-volume index. Ann Neurol 7: 508–514

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Sklar FH, Giller C, Shapiro K (1989) Manometric determinations of CSF absorption: Variance considerations. In: Gjerris F, BØrgesen SE, Soelberg SØrensen P (eds) Outflow of cerebrospinal fluid. Alfred Benzon symposium 27. Munksgaard, Copenhagen, pp 249–255

    Google Scholar 

  23. Stein SC, Langfitt TW (1974) Normal-pressure hydrocephalus. Predicting the results of cerebrospinal fluid shunting. J Neurosurg 41: 463–470

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Tans JTJ, Poortvliet DCJ (1984) Comparison of ventricular steady-state infusion with bolus infusion and pressure recording for differentiating between arrested and non-arrested hydrocephalus. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 72: 15–29

    Google Scholar 

  25. Tans JTJ, Poortvliet DCJ (1989) Relationship between compliance and resistance to outflow of CSF in adult hydrocephalus. J Neurosurg 71: 59–62

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Thomsen AM, BØrgesen SE, Bruhn P, Gjerris F (1986) Prognosis of dementia in normal-pressure hydrocephalus after a shunt operation. Ann Neurol 20: 304–310

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Vassilouthis J (1984) The syndrome of normal-pressure hydrocephalus. J Neurosurg 61: 501–509

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Vorstrup S, Christensen J, Gjerris F, SØrensen PS, Thomsen AM, Paulson OB (1987) Cerebral blood flow in patients with normal-pressure hydrocephalus before and after shunting. J Neurosurg 66: 379–386

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kosteljanetz, M., Nehen, A.M. & Kaalund, J. Cerebrospinal fluid outflow resistance measurements in the selection of patients for shunt surgery in the normal pressure hydrocephalus syndrome. A controlled trial. Acta neurochir 104, 48–53 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01842893

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01842893

Keywords

Navigation