Abstract
For years, cardiac troponins (cTn) have been regarded as the preferred biomarkers for the diagnosis of myocardial infarction and for the risk stratification of patients with acute coronary syndromes, as well as for the selection of patients who need an early invasive strategy, and for the guidance of adjunctive pharmacological therapy. In addition, measurement of cTn has been found useful for detection of myocardial necrosis in conditions unrelated to myocardial ischemia including acute pulmonary embolism, myocarditis, heart failure, sepsis, and end-stage renal disease. In these conditions, an unfavorable prognosis is unequivocally associated with detectable concentrations of cTn.
A major limitation of most currently available cTn assays is the lack of adequate precision, i.e., to measure cTn concentrations at the 99th percentile value with a coefficient of variation < 10%. As a consequence, many manufacturers have developed more sensitive cTn assays that now comply with precision criteria required by the Joint European Society of Cardiology/ American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association/World Heart Federation Task Force for the Redefinition of Acute Myocardial Infarction.
Using assays with higher analytic sensitivity more patients will be seen in clinical practice with the high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (TnThs) above the 99th percentile discriminator. The causes of these elevations may be due to acute, subacute and chronic cardiac disease such as heart failure or cardiomyopathies.
Zusammenfassung
Kardiale Troponine (cTn) sind seit Jahren der Referenzstandard für die Klassifikation und für die Risikostratifizierung von Patienten mit einem akuten Koronarsyndrom. Erhöhte Troponinwerte erlauben zudem, Patienten zu identifizieren, die von einer invasiven Therapiestrategie sowie einer intensiveren Antikoagulation und antithrombozytären Therapie profitieren.
Kardiales Troponin ist myokardspezifisch und tritt daher auch bei Erkrankungen des Herzens auf, die nicht durch ein akutes Koronarsyndrom bedingt sind, beispielsweise bei der akuten Lungenembolie, bei einer Myokarditis, bei einer schweren Niereninsuffizienz, bei dekompensierter Herzinsuffizienz oder hämodynamisch relevanter Aortenstenose sowie bei Kardiomyopathien. Die Höhe der Troponinfreisetzung spiegelt den Schweregrad dieser Erkrankungen wider und ist prognostisch relevant.
Eine Einschränkung der meisten kommerziell erhältlichen cTn-Assays ist die fehlende Präzision an der unteren Nachweisgrenze. So war es bislang nicht möglich, Konzentrationen an der 99. Perzentile einer gesunden Referenzpopulation mit einer Trennschärfe von < 10% Variationskoeffizient zu messen. Von einigen Herstellern werden jetzt Troponinassays angeboten, die niedrige Konzentrationen messen können (höhere analytische Sensitivität) und die Präzisionskriterien der neuen Infarktdefinition erfüllen. Andererseits ist zu erwarten, dass durch Erhöhung der Sensitivität die diagnostische Spezifität sinkt und jetzt vermehrt kardiale Erkrankungen erkannt werden, die bislang unerkannt geblieben waren.
Die Auswirkungen der Verwendung niedrigerer Troponinkonzentrationen bei Patienten mit akutem Koronarsyndrom für die Diagnose, Risikostratifizierung und Therapiesteuerung sowie die Bedeutung erhöhter Troponinwerte bei Patienten ohne akutes Koronarsyndrom, insbesondere bei Vorliegen einer Herzinsuffizienz, sind Gegenstand der vorliegenden Übersicht.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bassand JP, Hamm CW, Ardissino D, et al. Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes. The Task Force for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Non-ST-Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J 2007;28:1598–1660.
Hamm CW, Giannitsis E, Katus HA. Cardiac troponin elevations in patients without acute coronary syndrome. Circulation 2002;106:2871–2872.
Thygesen K, Alpert JS, White HD, et al., on behalf of the Joint ESC/ACCF/AHA/WHF Task Force for the Redefinition of Myocardial Infarction. Universal definition of myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J 2007;28:2525–2538.
Melanson SE, Morrow DA, Jarolim P. Earlier detection of myocardial injury in a preliminary evaluation using a new troponin I assay with improved sensitivity. Am J Clin Pathol 2007;128:282–286.
Giannitsis E, Kurz K, Hallermayer K, et al. The new high sensitive cardiac troponin T assay. Clin Chem 2009:in press.
Apple FS, Smith SW, Pearce LA, et al. Use of the Centaur TnI-Ultra assay for detection of myocardial infarction and adverse events in patients presenting with symptoms suggestive of acute coronary syndrome. Clin Chem 2008;54:723–728.
Morrow DA, Cannon CP, Jesse RL, et al. National Academy of Clinical Biochemistry laboratory medicine practice guidelines: clinical characteristics and utilization of biochemical markers in acute coronary syndromes. Clin Chem 2007;53:552–574.
Macrae AR, Kavsak PA, Lustig V, et al. Assessing the requirement for the 6-hour interval between specimens in the American Heart Association Classification of Myocardial Infarction in Epidemiology and Clinical Research Studies. Clin Chem 2006;52:812–818.
Apple FS, Pearce LA, Smith SW, et al. Role of monitoring changes in sensitive cardiac troponin I assay results for early diagnosis of myocardial infarction and prediction of risk of adverse events. Clin Chem 2009;55:930–937.
Eggers KM, Oldgren J, Nordenskjöld A, et al. Diagnostic value of serial measurement of cardiac markers in patients with chest pain: limited value of adding myoglobin to troponin I for exclusion of myocardial infarction. Am Heart J 2004;148:574–581.
Kontos MC, Fritz LM, Anderson FP, et al. Impact of the troponin standard on the prevalence of acute myocardial infarction. Am Heart J 2003;146:446–452.
Kavsak PA, MacRae AR, Lustig V, et al. The impact of the ESC/ACC redefinition of myocardial infarction and new sensitive troponin assays on the frequency of acute myocardial infarction. Am Heart J 2006;152:118–125.
Heidenreich PA, Alloggiamento T, Melsop K, et al. The prognostic value of troponin in patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes: a meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2001;38:478–485.
James S, Armstrong P, Califf R, et al. Troponin T levels and risk of 30-day outcomes in patients with the acute coronary syndrome: prospective verification in the GUSTO-IV trial. Am J Med 2003;115:178–184.
Morrow DA, Cannon CP, Rifai N, et al. Ability of minor elevations of troponins I and T to predict benefit from an early invasive strategy in patients with unstable angina and non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction. results from a randomized trial. JAMA 2001;286:2405–2412.
Diderholm E, Andrén B, Frostfeldt G, et al., Fast Revascularisation during InStability in Coronary artery disease (FRISC II) Investigators. The prognostic and therapeutic implications of increased troponin T levels and ST depression in unstable coronary artery disease: the FRISC II invasive troponin T electrocardiogram substudy. Am Heart J 2002;143:760–767.
Venge P, Lagerqvist B, Diderholm E, et al. Clinical performance of three cardiac troponin assays in patients with unstable coronary artery disease (a FRISC II substudy). Am J Cardiol 2002;89:1035–1041.
Morrow DA, Rifai N, Sabatine MS, et al. Evaluation of the AccuTnI cardiac troponin I assay for risk assessment in acute coronary syndromes. Clin Chem 2003;49:1396–1968.
Kontos MC, Shah R, Fritz LM, et al. Implication of different cardiac troponin I levels for clinical outcomes and prognosis of acute chest pain patients. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004;43:958–965.
Kavsak PA, Newman AM, Lustig V, et al. Long-term health outcomes associated with detectable troponin I concentrations. Clin Chem 2007;53:220–227.
Eggers KM, Lagerqvist B, Venge P, et al. Prognostic value of biomarkers during and after non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009;54:357–364.
Latini R, Masson S, Anand IS, et al. Prognostic value of very low plasma concentrations of troponin T in patients with stable chronic heart failure. Circulation 2007;116:1242–1249.
Omland T, Lemos JA, Christophi C, et al. Distribution and determinants of very low levels of cardiac troponin T in patients with stable coronary artery disease: The PEACE trial. Presented at the ESC 2008, Munich, August 30 to September 3, 2008:abstract.
Zethelius B, Johnston N, Venge P. Troponin I as a predictor of coronary heart disease and mortality in 70-year-old men: a community-based cohort study. Circulation 2006;113:1071–1078.
Eggers KM, Lind L, Ahlström H, et al. Prevalence and pathophysiological mechanisms of elevated cardiac troponin I levels in a population-based sample of elderly subjects. Eur Heart J 2008;29:2252–2258.
Lindahl B, Venge P, Wallentin L. Troponin T identifies patients with unstable coronary artery disease who benefit from long-term antithrombotic protection. Fragmin in Unstable Coronary Artery Disease (FRISC) Study Group. J Am Coll Cardiol 1997;29:43–48.
Morrow DA, Antman EM, Tanasijevic M, et al. Cardiac troponin I for stratification of early outcomes and the efficacy of enoxaparin in unstable angina: a TIMI-11B substudy. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000;36:1812–1817.
Newby LK, Ohman EM, Christenson RH, et al. Benefit of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibition in patients with acute coronary syndromes and troponin t-positive status: the paragon-B troponin T substudy. Circulation 2001;103:2891–2896.
Frey N, Dietz A, Kurowski V, et al. Angiographic correlates of a positive troponin T test in patients with unstable angina. Crit Care Med 2001;29:1130–1136.
Kastrati A, Mehilli J, Neumann FJ, et al., Intracoronary Stenting and Antithrombotic Regimen: Rapid Early Action for Coronary Treatment 2 (ISAR-REACT 2) Trial Investigators. Abciximab in patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention after clopidogrel pretreatment: the ISAR-REACT 2 randomized trial. JAMA 2006;295:1531–1538.
Olivetti G, Giordano G, Corradi D, et al. Gender differences and aging: effects on the human heart. J Am Coll Cardiol 1995;26:1068–1079.
Giannitsis E, Muller-Bardorff M, Kurowski V, et al. Independent prognostic value of cardiac troponin T in patients with confirmed pulmonary embolism. Circulation 2000;102:211–217.
Becattini C, Vedovati MC, Agnelli G. Prognostic value of troponins in acute pulmonary embolism: a meta-analysis. Circulation 2007;116:427–433.
Müller-Bardorff M, Weidtmann B, Giannitsis E, et al. Release kinetics of cardiac troponin T in survivors of confirmed severe pulmonary embolism. Clin Chem 2002;48:673–675.
Giannitsis E, Katus HA. Risk stratification in pulmonary embolism based on biomarkers and echocardiography. Circulation 2005;112:1520–1521.
Lankeit M, Dellas C, Katus HA, et al. Additive prognostische Information durch die Verwendung eines hoch sensitiven Assays für Troponin T bei Patienten mit akuter Lungenembolie. Clin Res Cardiol 2009;98:Suppl 1:P1015.abstract.
Lankeit M, Dellas C, Panzenboeck A, et al. Heart-type fatty acid-binding protein for risk assessment of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension. Eur Respir J 2008;31:1024–1029.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Giannitsis, E., Katus, H.A. Troponins and High-Sensitivity Troponins as Markers of Necrosis in CAD and Heart Failure. Herz 34, 600–606 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00059-009-3306-6
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00059-009-3306-6