Cognitive and motor effects of dopaminergic medication withdrawal in Parkinson’s disease

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2004.05.004Get rights and content

Abstract

Aims: Recent evidence points towards dissociable effects of dopaminergic medication on motor function and cognitive function mediated by different fronto-striatal neural circuits. This study aimed to clarify the role of dopaminergic medication in spatial working memory, and reinforcement-based associative learning in relation to clinical changes in motor function in early Parkinson’s disease (PD). Method: We tested 14 patients with mild to moderate PD on and off dopaminergic medication, on a spatial delayed-response working memory task, and on spatial and non-spatial (visual) trial-and-error learning tasks based on reinforcement, carefully matched for motor requirements. In addition, we explored relationships between the effects of withdrawal on motor symptom expression and performance on the cognitive tasks. Results: Withdrawal from dopaminergic medication significantly exacerbated motor symptoms. This was related to spatial learning, but not visual learning, or delayed response accuracy. Moreover, medication withdrawal led to dissociable effects of response latency on the spatial learning and spatial delayed response tasks, with patients becoming faster after spatial learning, but relatively slower on the delayed response task. These changes in response latency were unrelated to motor symptom impairment. Conclusion: Our findings suggest dissociable effects of dopamine medication withdrawal on cognitive processes putatively mediated by dorsal and ventral striatal regions.

Introduction

Parkinson’s disease (PD) is characterised primarily by nigrostriatal dopaminergic degeneration and is associated with motor and cognitive dysfunction (Bowen, Kamienny, Burns, & Yahr, 1975; Lees & Smith, 1983; Taylor et al., 1986, Taylor et al., 1990; Kish, Shannak, & Hornykiewicz, 1998; Pillon, Deweer, & Agid, 1993; Swainson et al., 2000; see Nieoullon, 2002 for review). Although additional neurotransmitter systems are involved, such as the noradrenergic (Zweig, Cardillo, Cohen, Giere, & Herdeen, 1993), serotonergic (Jellinger & Paulus, 1992) and cholinergic systems (Price, Whitehouse, & Struble, 1986), dopaminergic medication may theoretically improve some of the cognitive impairments seen in PD.

The neuropsychological profile observed in PD patients has been suggested to resemble that seen in patients with circumscribed frontal-lobe damage (Owen et al., 1992, Owen et al., 1993, Owen et al., 1995; Taylor et al., 1986, Taylor et al., 1990; Marié, Barré, Dupuy, Viader, Defer, & Baron, 1999; see Kulisevsky, 2000 for review). For example, performance on tests of working memory has been shown to be impaired in PD (Lange, Robbins, Marsden, James, Owen, & Paul, 1992; Kulisevsky, Avila, Barbanoj, Antonijoan, Berthier, & Gironel, 1996; Lueck, Tanyeri, Crawford, Henderson, & Kennard, 1990; Bublak, Muller, Gron, Reuter, & von Cramon, 1990; Postle et al., 1997b). However, not all studies in unmedicated patients have been able to confirm this (Fournet, Moreaud, Roulin, Naegele, & Pellat, 2000; Owen et al., 1992; Owen, Iddon, Hodges, Summers, & Robbins, 1997). In order to help clarify the role of dopaminergic medication in spatial working memory performance in PD, we have tested the effect of withdrawal from dopaminergic medication on a simple spatial delayed response task, similar to that used by Luciana, Depue, Arbisi, & Leon, 1992 and Luciana and Collins (1997) in healthy volunteers, based on tasks used with experimental animals.

The role of dopamine (DA) in motivation and reinforcement-based learning has also been demonstrated in experimental animals (Young, Ahier, Upton, Joseph, & Gray, 1998; Schultz, Tremblay, & Hollerman, 1998; Tremblay & Schultz, 1999; reviewed by Martin-Solech, Leenders, Chevalley, Missimer, Kunig, Magyar, Mino, & Schultz, 2001), implicating the ventral striatum, which connects the ‘limbic’ and prefrontal cortex via the orbitofrontal and anterior cingulate circuits (Alexander, DeLong, & Strick, 1986). To the best of our knowledge, no studies have assessed the effects of medication withdrawal on reinforcement-based learning tasks in patients with PD. However, some authors assessing associative learning in PD patients have observed no change following medication withdrawal (Lange et al., 1992), while others have reported that such learning is improved (Gotham, Brown, & Marsden, 1998). The ventral striatum includes the nucleus accumbens, and DA projections to this area are relatively spared at early stages of PD progression (Broussolle, Dentresangle, & Landais, 1999; Holthoff-Detto, Kessler, & Herholz, 1997; Kish et al., 1988). It has been suggested that ‘overdosing’ of ventral striatal regions by dopaminergic agents may lead to some cognitive deficits seen when patients are on medication (Cools et al., 2001, Cools et al., 2002, 2003; Gotham et al., 1988; Swainson et al., 2000). Therefore, if motivation and reinforcement learning are partly mediated by dopaminergic transmission in the ventral striatum (Young et al., 1998), medication withdrawal may, theoretically be beneficial to reinforcement learning by ‘normalising’ DA levels in the ventral striatum.

Dopaminergic medication may also have differential effects on spatial and non-spatial processing, with spatial memory tasks being more sensitive to the effects of medication (Cools et al., 2002, Kulisevsky et al., 1996, Lange et al., 1992; Postle et al., 1997a, Postle et al., 1997b ), although such a distinction has not always been found (e.g. Mollion, Ventre-Dominey, Dominey, & Broussolle, 2003). We have therefore, tested the effects of withdrawal from medication on performance in two trial-and-error associative learning tests based on reinforcement, carefully matched for motor requirements and utilising both spatial and non-spatial (visual) stimuli.

While the cognitive effects of medication may prove to be important in patient management, clinical efficacy is currently rated primarily on the cardinal motor symptoms of PD presentation. In this study, in addition to examining the effect of medication withdrawal on cognitive performance we have examined possible relationships between changes in motor and cognitive function in PD. Two assessments of motor function were included, one clinical rating scale and one simple computer-based movement-timing test. It was hypothesised that medication withdrawal would lead to dissociable effects of cognitive performance: measures sensitive to ‘dorsal striatal’ function such as working memory would be associated with changes in motor symptom presentation, whereas aspects of reinforcement-based learning would be improved after medication withdrawal, unrelated to clinical improvement.

Section snippets

Participants

Fourteen patients (eight female) with mild to moderate idiopathic PD, aged from 54 to 76 years (mean 66.6, S.D. 6.6), were seen on two occasions, separated by a minimum of 1 week. On one occasion patients omitted their morning dopaminergic tablets (specifically l-dopa, dopamine agonists and amantadine; patients treated with selegiline were asked not to discontinue this medication and no patients were taking anticholinergic medications), thus withdrawing from medication for a minimum of 15 h.

Reaction time

This test, from the Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery (CANTAB; Robbins, James, Owen, Sahakian, McInnes, & Rabbitt, 1994), measured reaction time and movement time. Participants were asked to hold down a lever and look at the computer screen. When a circle appeared at the centre of the screen, participants were instructed to let go of the lever as fast as possible (reaction time) and touch the circle as fast and as accurately as possible (movement time and accuracy). Two sets

Delayed response task

This test of ‘online’ spatial working memory (Goldman-Rakic, 1987) comprised 10 short-delay trials and 16 long-delay trials (the first two short-delay trials were discarded as practice). Participants were shown a black cross at the centre of a white screen. A black circle then appeared at a unique location on the screen for 150 ms. Participants were instructed to fixate on the cross, and touch the screen at the position of the black circle in response to a tone, which sounded 500 ms following the

Spatial trial-and-error learning task

On each trial, participants were shown two small squares in different locations on the screen, and asked to “learn the pairs”. Four ‘correct’ pairs and four ‘incorrect’ pairs were presented in a pseudo-random order, a total of 12 times. Thus, 96 trials were presented and each square location was correctly paired to only one other. The pairings were arbitrary, but fixed throughout the task. Participants responded to each pair by touching one of two boxes on the bottom of the screen marked “PAIR”

Visual (non-spatial) trial-and-error learning task

Formally similar to the spatial test described above, the visual learning test comprised 72 trials, each consisting of two figures written in Hiragana script presented at the centre of the screen. Participants were asked to learn the pairs (Fig. 1b), and indicate their response by touching the “PAIR” or “NOT PAIR” box. Each character was correctly paired to only one other, and each pair and distractor-pair appeared 12 times in a pseudo-random order. As with the spatial task, learning was based

Results

Mean performance accuracy and response latency for the cognitive tasks are summarised in Table 2, Table 3, respectively.

The between-subjects analysis revealed no effect of testing order (on/off versus off/on) on motor symptom expression or performance in any of the tests, and regression analysis revealed no effect of age, disease duration, NART IQ or MMP scores on performance. These factors are not included in the results reported below.

Discussion

The present study tested the effects of withdrawal from dopamine medication on tasks of spatial working memory, and spatial and non-spatial (visual) reinforcement-based associative learning, in a group of fourteen patients with mild to moderate PD. Tasks such as the ones presently used have been previously shown to be sensitive to frontal-lobe damage, and to dopamine antagonists in normal volunteers (Hinton, Montgomery, Bantick, Grasby, & Mehta, 2002; Luciana & Collins, 1997; Mehta, Manes,

Acknowledgements

We thank the patients and volunteers for their participation in the study, the staff at the Sir John McMichael Centre, Hammersmith Hospital and Drs M. Doder and P. Edison.

References (58)

  • R. Swainson et al.

    Probabilistic learning and reversal deficits in patients with Parkinson’s disease or frontal or temporal lobe lesions: possible adverse effects of dopaminergic medication

    Neuropsychologia

    (2000)
  • D.M. Tucker et al.

    Mood and spatial memory: emotion and right hemisphere contribution to spatial cognition

    Biological Psychology

    (1999)
  • M. Verin et al.

    Delayed response tasks and prefrontal lesions in man—evidence for self generated patterns of behaviour with poor environmental modulation

    Neuropsychologia

    (1993)
  • A.M.J. Young et al.

    Increased extracellular dopamine in the nucleus accumbens of the rat during associative learning of neutral stimuli

    Neuroscience

    (1998)
  • G.E. Alexander et al.

    Parallel organisation of functionally segregated circuits linking basal ganglia and cortex

    Annual Review of Neuroscience

    (1986)
  • F.P. Bowen et al.

    Parkinsonism: effects of levodopa treatment on concept formation

    Neurology Minneapolis

    (1975)
  • T.J. Brozoski et al.

    Cognitive deficit caused by regional depletion of dopamine in prefrontal cortex of rhesus monkey

    Science

    (1979)
  • P. Bublak et al.

    Manipulation of working memory information is impaired in Parkinson’s disease and related to working memory capacity

    Neuropsychology

    (2002)
  • Cochran, W. G., & Cox, G. M. (1957) Experimental designs. New York:...
  • P. Collins et al.

    The effect of dopamine depletion from the caudate nucleus of the common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus) on tests of prefrontal cognitive function

    Behavioural Neuroscience

    (2000)
  • R. Cools et al.

    Enhanced or impaired cognitive function in Parkinson’s disease as a function of dopaminergic medication and task demands

    Cerebral Cortex

    (2001)
  • R. Cools et al.

    Dopaminergic modulation of high-level cognition in Parkinson’s disease: The role of the prefrontal cortex revealed by PET

    Brain

    (2002)
  • A. Costa et al.

    Dopaminergic modulation of visual-spatial working memory in Parkinson’s disease

    Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders

    (2003)
  • Fahn, S., Elton, R. L., Members of the UPDRS Development Committee. (1987). Unified Parkinson’s disease rating...
  • N. Fournet et al.

    Working memory functioning in medicated Parkinson’s disease patients and the effect of withdrawal of dopaminergic medication

    Neuropsychology

    (2000)
  • W.R. Gibb et al.

    The relevance of the Lewy body to the pathogenesis of idiopathic Parkinson’s disease

    Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry

    (1988)
  • Goldman-Rakic, P. S., (1987). Circuitry of primate prefrontal cortex and regulation of behaviour by representational...
  • A.M. Gotham et al.

    “Frontal” cognitive function in patients with Parkinson’s disease ‘on’ and ‘off’ levodopa

    Brain

    (1988)
  • E.C. Hinton et al.

    Emotional memory and selective attention are impaired following 400 mg sulpiride in healthy volunteers

    Journal of Psychopharmacology

    (2002)
  • Cited by (32)

    • Distinct effects of dopamine vs STN stimulation therapies in associative learning and retention in Parkinson disease

      2016, Behavioural Brain Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      Indeed, previous studies have reported beneficial effects of dopamine replacement in PD in particular in non-motor processes involving the dorsal fronto-striatal function like task-switching, visuo-spatial processing and visual working memory [1,7–9]. In contrast, STN DBS has constantly been shown to alter the performance of executive functions such as verbal fluency [9–17]. Contrasting effects on non-motor symptoms in dopa-medicated PD patients have been often related to the dual dorsal vs ventral organisation of the striatum [18,19].

    • The effect of Parkinson's disease and levodopa on adaptation of anticipatory postural adjustments

      2013, Neuroscience
      Citation Excerpt :

      Medication withdrawal improves (Gotham et al., 1988) or evokes no change (Lange et al., 1992) in associative learning. Effects on spatial learning depend on responsiveness of motor symptoms to medication (Fern-Pollak et al., 2004); accuracy decreases in those with greatest motor decline in the OFF state but improves in those with minimal motor decline compared to their ON state. Negative effects of levodopa on learning in PD may result from dopamine saturation of the ventral striatum (Gotham et al., 1988; Swainson et al., 2000; Fern-Pollak et al., 2004), in which dopaminergic projections are preserved in early PD (Kish et al., 1988; Broussolle et al., 1999).

    • The dopaminergic basis of cognitive and motor performance in Alzheimer's disease

      2010, Neurobiology of Disease
      Citation Excerpt :

      Work in experimental animals indicates an ‘inverted-U’ dose–response between DA (D1) receptor stimulation in the PFC and cognition (Arnsten, 1998; Williams and Goldman-Rakic, 1995; Zahrt et al., 1997), and studies of DA (D2) receptor gene polymorphisms suggest that a similar mechanism might underlie differential effects of striatal DA (D2) receptor stimulation on reward-based learning in humans (Cohen et al., 2007; Frank and O'Reilly, 2006). Other insights into potential dissociable effects of dopaminergic stimulation upon functioning have been shown in Parkinson's disease, where optimization of motor function has been found to have a detrimental effect upon cognitive tasks, possibly as a result of pushing non-motor systems beyond their optimal dose–response curves (Fern-Pollak et al., 2004; Gotham et al., 1988; Rowe et al., 2008). Our findings indicate that the potential benefits of DA (D2) receptor agonists upon visuomotor speed and episodic memory may occur at the expense of attentional performance in AD.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text