Table 1

Benefits and risks of screening people for > 60% asymptomatic carotid stenosis in different prevalence groups: best case scenario

Prevalence (%)Ultrasound to angiogram to surgeryUltrasound to MRA to surgeryUltrasound direct to surgery
Ratio benefit: harmNet strokes prevented/
10 000 screened
Strokes or deaths
in false positives/
10 000 screened1-150
Ratio benefit: harmNet strokes prevented/
10 000 screened
Strokes or deaths
in false positives/
10 000 screened1-150
Ratio benefit: harmNet strokes prevented/
10 000 screened
Strokes or deaths
in false positives/
10 000 screened1-150
10.7−483.850.50.6−410
51.81684.9280.52.22010
102.24085.1560.53.4509
202.68875.21120.44.01108
252.611265.21410.44.31418
  • Assumptions: ultrasound sensitivity and specificity 93% each; MRA sensitivity and specificity 95% each; surgical risk of stroke or death=1.5%; angiographic risk of stroke or death=1.2%; reduction in risk of ipsilateral stroke for true positive severe stenosis from 11% to 3% over five years.

  • 1-150 Number of angiographic or surgical strokes or deaths caused in people who are false positives/10 000 screened.