Difference in the size of normalised gastrocnemius (GAS) and tibialis anterior (TIB) IEMG (%) comparing the first trial of platform translation following platform rotations (left) and the first trial of rotation following translations (right) for all controls and cerebellar patients.
| Control subjects | Cerebellar patients | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Translation following rotations | Rotation following translations | Translation following rotations | Rotation following Translations | |||||||||
| No | GAS | TIB | GAS | TIB | No | GAS | TIB | GAS | TIB | |||
| 1 | 240.6 | −87.9 | −39.7 | 92.7 | 1 | 133.7 | −94.8 | −85.2 | 124.3 | |||
| 2 | 69.9 | −60.4 | −51.8 | 69.3 | 2 | 69.2 | −49.3 | −43.2 | 99.8 | |||
| 3 | 86.6 | 4.2 | −10.3 | 55.0 | 3 | 60.4 | −96.7 | −134.7 | 79.4 | |||
| 4 | 75.3 | −73.4 | −77.1 | 107.4 | 4 | 84.0 | −26.3 | −23.4 | 93.2 | |||
| 5 | 172.3 | −39.5 | −112.2 | 271.9 | 5 | 3.54 | −6.6 | −111.7 | 76.7 | |||
| 6 | 143.7 | −53.7 | −53.1 | 56.2 | 6 | 38.9 | −112.4 | −113.9 | 57.3 | |||
| 7 | 142.3 | −34.8 | −65.6 | 48.5 | 7 | 127.3 | −74.2 | −5 | 123.7 | |||
| 8 | 120.6 | −18.7 | −125.0 | 232.2 | 8 | — | −104.4 | — | 58.0 | |||
| 9 | 65.4 | −124.6 | −64.7 | 89 | 9 | 53.1 | −84.0 | −24.6 | 43.2 | |||
| 10 | 57.9 | −79.9 | — | 70.8 | 10 | 200.3 | 63.8 | 83.9 | 52.7 | |||
| 11 | 116.7 | 6.8 | — | — | 11 | 65.3 | −45.9 | — | — | |||
| 12 | 58.3 | −85.1 | −15.2 | 52.7 | 12 | 66.2 | −58.3 | −40 | 82.3 | |||
| 13 | 88.2 | −65.7 | −46.6 | 206.2 | 13 | 139.3 | 32.9 | — | — | |||
| 14 | 65.9 | −56.0 | −252.0 | 74.3 | ||||||||
| 15 | 110.5 | −89.7 | — | — | ||||||||
— No data available due to technical problems. A negative sign indicates a decrease in IEMG size.