Table 2

Best models obtained by multiple regression analyses for the prediction of motor recovery of the arm at 2, 6 ,and 12 months post-stroke from five predictor variables measured at baseline, and for the prediction of motor recovery of the arm at 6 and 12 months post-stroke from five variables measured at 2 months after the onset of stroke

Predictors: baselinePredictors: 2 months
BFM: 2 months (n=50)
Model: R2=74.28, F=67.882-165
PredictorsB tValueAdded R2
motor performance1.1911.492-165 70.25
muscle tone-0.84-2.722-160 4.03
constant9.71
BFM: 6 months (n=48)BFM: 6 months (n=40)
Model: R2=60.47, F=34.422-165 Model: R2 =85.41, F=51.202-165
PredictorsB tValueAdded R2 PredictorsB tValueAdded R2
motor performance1.036.772-165 52.09motor performance0.616.412-165 74.81
SSEP9.993.092-160 8.38MEP10.064.442-165 5.78
constant17.42overall disability0.182.232-150 3.12
muscle tone-0.400.202-150 1.7
constant8.43
BFM: 12 months (n=45)BFM: 12 months (n=37)
Model: R2=58.05, F=29.062-165 Model: R2=80.56, F=33.152-165
PredictorsB tValueAdded R2 PredictorsB tValueAdded R2
motor performance1.146.022-165 49.41motor performance0.614.252-165 68.30
SSEP12.062.942-160 8.64MEP13.093.772-165 5.27
constant21.36muscle tone-0.66-2.242-150 4.47
overall disability0.232.042-150 2.52
constant12.33
  • B=regression coefficient; BFM=Brunnström-Fugl-Meyer test.

  • 2-150 p<0.05;

  • 2-160 p<0.01;

  • 2-165 p<0.001.