Table 1

 Psychometric criteria

Psychometric propertyCriteria
EDSS, Expanded Disability Status Scale; GNDS, Guy’s Neurological Disability Scale; MS, multiple sclerosis; MSIS-29, Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale; PP, primary progressive; RR, relapsing–remitting; SP, secondary progressive.
Data quality Missing items <10%
High percentage of computable scale scores
High item test–retest reliability: r ⩾0.50
Scaling assumptions Similar response option frequency distribution
Skewness between −1 and +1
Similar means and standard deviations
Similar and substantial item-total correlations: r >0.30
Acceptability Scores should span the full scale range
Mean scores should be around the midpoint
Floor and ceiling effect <20%
Skewness between −1 and +1
Reliability Cronbach’s α >0.80
Scale test–retest reliability (ICC) >0.80
Responsiveness Correlation between change score and transition score should be high
Clinically important difference: 0.5  =  small, 1.0  =  moderate, 1.5 large
Validity
    Internal validityModerate intercorrelation: r = 0.30–0.70
    External validityHigh correlation between MSIS-29 physical scale and EDSS
Low correlation between MSIS-29 psychological scale and EDSS
High correlation between MSIS-29 physical scale and GNDS
Low correlation between MSIS-29 psychological scale and GNDS
    Group differences validitySimilar and low correlations between men and women
Similar and low correlations for age
Hypotheses Mean physical MSIS-29 score for different groups of the EDSS score:
 MSIS-29 score (EDSS 0.0–3.5) < MSIS-29 score (EDSS 4.0–6.0)
 MSIS-29 score (EDSS 0.0–3.5) < MSIS-29 score (EDSS ⩾6.5)
 MSIS-29 score (EDSS 4.0–6.0) < MSIS-29 score (EDSS ⩾6.5)
Mean physical MSIS-29 score for different groups of the GNDS score:
 MSIS-29 score (GNDS <15) < MSIS-29 score (GNDS ⩾15)
Mean physical and psychological MSIS-29 scores for different MS subtypes:
 MSIS-29 score (RR) < MSIS-29 score (SP)
 MSIS-29 score (RR) < MSIS-29 score (PP)
 MSIS-29 score (SP) < MSIS-29 score (PP)