Esselink et al20 | 1b | STN | S = 20 | S: 61 (55–66) | S: 12 (9–17) | PDQL | 6 | Mean total score improvement of |
| | | P = 14 | P: 62 (57–68) | P: 11 (9–16) | | | 13 and 18 in P and S, respectively |
Lagrange et al22 | 2 | STN | 60 | 56 (SD 10) | 14 (SD 8) | PDQL | 12 | Total score improved 43%* |
Spottke et al25 | 2 | STN | 16 | 56 (SD 8.5) | 10.8 (SD 3.9) | SIP | 6 | Total score improved 58%* |
Martinez-Martin et al23 | 2 | STN | 17 | 60.9 (43–74) | 16.4 (7–38) | PDQ-39 | 6 | Total score improved 49%* |
Patel et al24 | 2 | STN | 16 | 56 (SD 11) | 10 (SD 3.5) | PDQ-39 | 12 | Total score improved 14%* |
Just and Ostergaard21 | 2 | STN | S = 11 | S: 59.8 (51.8–70.9) | S: 14 (7–25) | PDQ-39 | 3, 6 | Mean total score improved 16.1*† |
| | | M = 13 | M: 61.4 (53.8–69.2) | M: 16 (10–27) | | | in the surgically and –0.4*† in the |
| | | | | | | | medically treated groups |
Tröster et al26 | 2 | STN | 26 | 56.6 (SD 11) | 9.5 (SD 4.9) | PDQ-39 | 3 | Total score improved from 42.8 to 29.4*† |
Lezcano et al27 | 2 | STN | 14 | 63.2 (SD 8.6) | 14.3 (SD 5) | PDQ-39 | 12, 24 | Total score improved 62%* |
Woods et al29 | 3 | Vim | 6 | 70.83 (SD 8.75) | 7.33 (SD 2.66) | PDQ-39 | 12 | PDQ-39SI non-significant improvement |
Straits-Troster et al28 | 3 | Vim | 7 | 65.1 (SD 12.0) | 8 (SD 3.8) | SIP | 3 | Total SIP score non-significant improvement |
Straits-Troster et al28 | 3 | GPi | 9 | 50.3 (SD 13) | 10.3 (SD 4.9) | SIP | 3 | Total SIP score improved* |