| Peer review at JNNP |
All papers submitted to JNNP are reviewed by the editorial team with about 50% rejected without being sent out for external peer review on the grounds of priority, insufficient originality, scientific flaws, or the absence of a message that is important to the readers of the journal. A decision on such papers is taken very quickly, usually within 7 days.
The remaining articles are assigned to one of the Associate Editors who will send it to one or more external reviewers selected from a database of more than 3000 experts. The paper may also be sent to to a specialist statistical reviewer.
Reviewers and Associate Editors advise the Editor who is responsible for the final decision to accept or reject a manuscript. All papers recommended for acceptance are discussed at a bi-weekly editorial meeting; at this time it may be agreed to commission a Pespective (commentary) to accompany the paper.
The Editor can enter into correspondence about papers rejected as being unsuitable for publication, although the Editor's decision in these matters is final. The Editor retains the customary right to determine style and, if necessary, to shorten material accepted for publication.
We operate an optional system of open peer review. This means that reviewers can sign their reports if they wish. Open peer review does not mean that authors should contact reviewers directly to discuss their reports; all queries should still be directed through the editorial office.
View more information about open peer review.
|
Skip main navigation
