Skip to main content
Log in

How to identify psychogenic disorders of stance and gait

A video study in 37 patients

  • Original Communications
  • Published:
Journal of Neurology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Thirty-seven patients with psychogenic disorders of stance and gait were clinically evaluated, recorded on video, and analysed with regard to clinical phenomenology. Characteristic, suggestive and unspecific features were identified. Six characteristic features proved most valuable for diagnosis of psychogenesis, as they occurred alone or in combination in 97% of patients: (1) momentary fluctuations of stance and gait, often in response to suggestion; (2) excessive slowness or hesitation of locomotion incompatible with neurological disease; (3) “psychogenic” Romberg test with a build-up of sway amplitudes after a silent latency or with improvement by distraction; (4) uneconomic postures with wastage of muscular energy; (5) the “walking on ice” gait pattern, which is characterized by small cautious steps with fixed ankle joints; (6) sudden buckling of the knees, usually without falls. Seventy-three percent of patients had additional suggestive features. Classification into characteristic subtypes was not found useful because predominant features varied from patient to patient and occurred in various combinations. Factitious impairment of stance and gait was studied in 13 healthy drama students. Simulated gait dysfunction appeared less conspicuous and more difficult to diagnose than the clinical psychogenic disorders.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bing R (1924) Lehrbuch der Nervenkrankheiten, 3rd edn. Urban & Schwarzenberg, Berlin, pp 663–667

    Google Scholar 

  2. Dejerine J (1914) Semiologie des affections du système nerveux. Masson, Paris, pp 541–549

    Google Scholar 

  3. Desai BT, Porter RJ, Penry JK (1982) Psychogenic seizures. Arch Neurol 39:202–209

    Google Scholar 

  4. Fahn S, Williams DT (1988) Psychogenic dystonia. Adv Neurol 50:431–455

    Google Scholar 

  5. Gates JR, Ramani V, Whalen S, Loewenson R (1985) Ictal characteristics of pseudoseizures. Arch Neurol 42:1183–1187

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gullick TA, Spinks IP, King DW (1982) Pseudoseizures: ictal phenomena. Neurology 32:24–30

    Google Scholar 

  7. Janet P (1920) The major symptoms of hysteria, 2nd edn. Macmillan, New York

    Google Scholar 

  8. Keane JR (1989) Hysterical gait disorders: 60 cases. Neurology 39:586–589

    Google Scholar 

  9. Koller WC, Trimble J (1985) The gait abnormality of Huntington's disease. Neurology 35:1450–1454

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lempert T, Dieterich M, Huppert D, Brandt T (1990) Psychogenic disorders in neurology. Frequency and clinical spectrum. Acta Neurol Scand 82:335–340

    Google Scholar 

  11. Luther JS, McNamara JO, Carwile S, Miller P, Hope V (1982) Pseudoepileptic seizures: methods and video analysis to aid diagnosis. Ann Neurol 12:458–462

    Google Scholar 

  12. Papa SM, Gershanik OS (1988) Orthostatic tremor: an essential tremor variant? Mov Disord 2:97–108

    Google Scholar 

  13. Simopoulos AM, Hildegard H (1969) Progressive hysterical tetraplegia with contractures. A case study. Johns Hopkins Med J 125:14–18

    Google Scholar 

  14. Solberg Sorensen P, Jansen EC, Gjerris F (1986) Motor disturbance in normal pressure hydrocephalus. Arch Neurol 43:34–38

    Google Scholar 

  15. Strümpell A (1899) Lehrbuch der speziellen Pathologie und Therapie der inneren Kankheiten, vol 3, 12th edn. Vogel, Leipzig, pp 614–616

    Google Scholar 

  16. Sudarski L, Sheldon S (1987) Gait disorder in late-life hydrocephalus. Arch Neurol 263–267

  17. Thompson APJ, Sills JA (1988) Diagnosis of functional illness presenting with gait disorder. Arch Dis Child 63:148–153

    Google Scholar 

  18. Thompson CE (1982) Hysterical paralysis. J Fam Pract 15:1169–1173

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lempert, T., Brandt, T., Dieterich, M. et al. How to identify psychogenic disorders of stance and gait. J Neurol 238, 140–146 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00319680

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00319680

Key words

Navigation