Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Automated computerized radiogrammetry of the second metacarpal and its correlation with absorptiometry of the forearm and spine

  • Clinical Investigations
  • Published:
Calcified Tissue International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The value of a new computerized radiogrammetric method of assessment of the second metacarpal has been evaluated, and its results have been compared with those of single (SPA) and dual photon absorptiometry measurements (forearm and spine) in 74 and 79 postmenopausal women, respectively. Standard hand X-rays were digitized by a video-camera connected to a microcomputer. The combined cortical thickness (CCT) was automatically calculated in a zone of 10 mm around the midpart of the second metacarpal. The intra- and interobserver coefficients of variation were close to 1%. The correlation between CCT and SPA of the proximal and midforearm (with a significant amount of cortical bone) was satisfactory (r=0.62 and 0.50, respectively; P<0.001). The correlation between CCT and osteodensitometry of sites comprising more trabecular bone were not so good (0.50 for lumbar and 0.44 for distal forearm bone mineral density, respectively), but still significant (P<0.001). Radiogrammetry proved unaffected by a change of X-ray apparatus, as measurements of 48 metacarpals radiographed by two different kinds of X-ray apparatus were not significantly different. Radiogrammetry is by no means the best method to evaluate bone mass. Its automation did not improve the correlation with osteodensitometric values. Radiogrammetry is still of interest in mass screening, particularly when other more expensive techniques such as osteodensitometric methods of bone mass measurement are not readily available. Its automation makes it simpler, faster, and more precise, rendering its use easier on a larger scale.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Barnett E, Nordin BEC (1960) The radiologic diagnosis of osteoporosis. Clin Radiol 11:166–174

    Google Scholar 

  2. Meema HE, Meema S (1981) Radiogrammetry, In: Cohn S (ed) Noninvasive measurements of bone mass and their clinical applications. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, pp 5–50

    Google Scholar 

  3. Morgan DB (1973) The metacarpal bone: a comparison of the various indices for the assessment of the amount of bone and for the detection of loss of bone. Clin Radiol 24:77–82

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bloom RA, Pogrund H, Libson E (1983) Radiogrammetry of the metacarpal: a critical reappraisal. Skeletal Radiol 10:5–9

    Google Scholar 

  5. Mazess RB (1987) Bone density in diagnosis of osteoporosis: thresholds and breakpoints. Calcif Tissue Int 41:117–118

    Google Scholar 

  6. Wasnich RD (1991) Bone mass measurements in diagnosis and assessment of therapy. Am J Med 91:54S-60S

    Google Scholar 

  7. Mazess RB (1981) Noninvasive measurement of local bone in osteoporosis. In: DeLuca H (ed) Osteoporosis: recent advances in treatment and pathogensis. University Park Press, Baltimore, pp 25–37

    Google Scholar 

  8. Alhava EM (1991) Bone density measurements. Calcif Tissue Int 49:S21-S23

    Google Scholar 

  9. Aitken JM, Smith CB, Horton PW, Clark DL, Boyd JF, Smith DA (1974) The interrelationships between bone mineral at different skeletal sites in male and female cadavera. J Bone Joint Surg 56B:370–375

    Google Scholar 

  10. Garn SM (1970) The earlier gain and the later loss of cortical bone. In: Thomas CC (ed) Nutritional perspective. Springfield, IL, pp 1–146

  11. Mazess RB (1982) On aging bone loss. Clin Orthop Rel Res 165:239–252

    Google Scholar 

  12. Bohr H, Schaadt O (1985) Bone mineral content of the femoral neck and shaft: relation between cortical and trabecular bone. Calcif Tissue Int 37:340–344

    Google Scholar 

  13. Nordin BEC (1984) Metabolic bone and stone disease. Churchill Livingstone, London, pp 1–70

    Google Scholar 

  14. Wootton R, Breteron PJ, Clark MB, Hesp R, Hodkinson HM, Klenerman L, Reeve J, Slavin G, Tellez M (1979) Fractured neck of femur in the elderly: an attempt to identify patients at risk. Clin Sci 57:93–101

    Google Scholar 

  15. Horssman A (1981) In: DeLuca HF, Frost HM, Jee WSS, Johnston CC Jr (eds) Osteoporosis: recent advances in treatment and pathogenesis. University Park Press, Baltimore

    Google Scholar 

  16. Jensen GF, Christiansen C, Boesen J, Hegedus V, Transbol I (1982) Epidemiology of postmenopausal spinal and long bone fractures. A unifying approach to postmenopausal osteoporosis. Clin Orthop Rel Res 166:75–81

    Google Scholar 

  17. Alho A, Husby T, Hoiseth A (1986) Bone mineral content and mechanical strength: an ex vivo study on human femora at autopsy. Clin Orthop Rel Res 227:292–297

    Google Scholar 

  18. Aitken JM (1984) Relevance of osteoporosis in women with fracture of the femoral neck. Br Med J 288:597–601

    Google Scholar 

  19. Brincat M, Moniz CF, Kabalan S, Versi E, O'Dowd T, Magos AL, Montgomery J, Studd JWW (1987) Decline in skin collagen content and metacarpal index after the menopause and its prevention with sex hormone replacement. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 94:126–129

    Google Scholar 

  20. Meema HE, Meema S (1987) Postmenopausal osteoporosis: simple screening method for diagnosis before structural failure. Radiology 164:405–410

    Google Scholar 

  21. Gallagher JC, Kable WT, Goldgar D (1991) Effect of progestin therapy on cortical and trabecular bone: comparison with estrogen. Am J Med 90:171–178

    Google Scholar 

  22. Reid IR, King AR, Alexander CJ, Ibberton HK (1988) Prevention of steroid-induced osteoporosis with APD. Lancet 23:143–146

    Google Scholar 

  23. Ettinger B, Genant HK, Cann CE (1987) Postmenopausal bone loss is prevented by treatment with low dosage estrogen with calcium. Ann Intern Med 106:40–45

    Google Scholar 

  24. Meema HE (1991) Improved vertebral fracture threshold in postmenopausal osteoporosis by radiogrammetric measurements: its usefulness in selection for preventive therapy. J Bone Miner Res 6:9–14

    Google Scholar 

  25. Szucs J, Horvath C, Kollin E, Szathmari M, Hollo I (1992) Three-year calcitonin combination therapy for postmenopausal osteoporosis with crush fractures of the spine. Calcif Tissue Int 50:7–10

    Google Scholar 

  26. Nordin BEC, Baker MR, Horssman A, Peacock M (1985) A prospective trial of the effect of vitamin D supplementation on metacarpal bone loss in elderly women. Am J Clin Nutr 42:470–474

    Google Scholar 

  27. Dubois P, Derisquebourg T, Marchandise X (1991) Mesure autometique de l'épaisseur corticale moyenne des métacarpiens. Rev Im Med 3:89–92

    Google Scholar 

  28. Devogelaer JP, Depresseaux G, Nagant de Deuxchaisnes C (1988) Reproductibility of single photon absorptiometry by rectilinear forearm scanning at three sites. In: Dequeker J, Geusens P, Wahner HW (eds) Bone mineral measurement by photon absorptiometry. Leuven University Press, Leuven, Belgium, pp 215–219

    Google Scholar 

  29. Deveogelaer JP, Depresseux G, LeThi C, Nagant de Deuxchaisnes C (1988) Reproductibility of dual photon absorptiometry on Novo type 22a in relation to various procedures and interfering factors. In: Dequeker J, Geusens P, Wahner HW (eds) Bone mineral measurement by photon absorptiometry. Leuven University Press, Leuven, Belgium, pp 205–214

    Google Scholar 

  30. Snedecor GW, Cochran WG (1967) Statistical methods. Correlation, 6th ed. The Iowa State University Press, Ames, Iowa, USA, pp 172–198

    Google Scholar 

  31. Dequeker J (1977) Problems in measuring amount of bone: reproductibility, variability, sequential evaluation. In: Meunier PJ (ed) Bone histomorphometry. Armour-Montagu, Paris, pp 19–38

    Google Scholar 

  32. Rico H, Hernandez ER (1989) Bone radiogrammetry: caliper versus magnifying glass. Calcif Tissue Int 45:285–287

    Google Scholar 

  33. Kalla AA, Meyers OL, Parkyn ND, Kotze TJRW (1989) Osteoporosis screening. Radiogrammetry revisited. Br J Rheumatol 28:511–517

    Google Scholar 

  34. Minaguchi H, Maki M, Gorai I (1990) Newly developed bone mass measurement: digital image processing (DIP) method in X-ray film of hand. In: Christiansen C, Overgaard K (eds) Osteoporosis. Handelstrykkeriet Aalborg Aps, Aalborg, pp 762–764

    Google Scholar 

  35. Matsumoto C, Kushida K, Sumi Y, Yamazaki K, Taniguchi M, Inoue T (1990) Development of computed X-ray densitometry and its applications. In: Christiansen C, Overgaard K (eds) Osteoporosis. Handelstrykkeriet Aalborg Aps, Aalborg, pp 772–775

    Google Scholar 

  36. Cameron EC, Boyd RM, Luk D, McIntosh HW, Walker VR (1977) Cortical thickness measurements and photon absorptiometry for determination of bone quantity. CMA J 116:145–147

    Google Scholar 

  37. Wishart JM, Horowitz M, Bochner M, Need AG, Nordin BEC (1993) Relationships between metacarpal morphometry, forearm and vertebral bone density and fractures in postmenopausal women. Br J Radiol 66:435–440

    Google Scholar 

  38. Geusens P, Dequeker J, Verstraeten A, Nijs J (1986) Age-, sex-, and menopause-related changes of vertebral and peripheral bone: population study dual and single photon absorptiometry and radiogrammetry. J Nucl Med 27:1540–1549

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Clinique Rhumatologique, Centre A. Verhaeghe, Hôpital B, CHU de Lille, 59037, Lille Cedex, France

    T. Derisquebourg, B. Duquesnoy & B. Delcambre

  2. Laboratoire de Biophysique, Faculté de Médecine, Place de Verdun, 59045, Lille Cedex, France

    P. Dubois & X. Marchandise

  3. Service de Rhumatologie, Université Catholique de Louvain, Hôpital Universitaire Saint-Luc, Avenue Hippocrate 10, 1200, Bruxelles, Belgium

    J. P. Devogelaer, E. Meys & C. Nagant de Deuxchaisnes

Authors
  1. T. Derisquebourg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. P. Dubois
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. J. P. Devogelaer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. E. Meys
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. B. Duquesnoy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. C. Nagant de Deuxchaisnes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. B. Delcambre
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. X. Marchandise
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Derisquebourg, T., Dubois, P., Devogelaer, J.P. et al. Automated computerized radiogrammetry of the second metacarpal and its correlation with absorptiometry of the forearm and spine. Calcif Tissue Int 54, 461–465 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00334323

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00334323

Key words

Search

Navigation