Skip to main content
Log in

Forensic neuropsychology: The art of practicing a science that does not yet exist

  • Published:
Neuropsychology Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Despite its future promise, neuropsychological evidence generally lacks scientifically demonstrated value for resolving legal issues, and thus, if admitted into court, should be accorded little or no weight. In support of this contention, examples of problems and limits in forensic neuropsychology are described. These include contrasts between the clinical and forensic context; the base-rate problem; lack of standardized practices; problems assessing credibility or malingering; difficulties determining prior functioning, limits in the capacity to integrate complex data; and the lack of relation between judgmental accuracy and education, experience, or credentials. Some possible counterarguments are also addressed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alekoumbides, A., Charter, R. A., Adkins, T. G., and Seacat, G. F. (1987). The diagnosis of brain damage by the WAIS, WMS, and Reitan Battery utilizing standardized scores corrected for age and education.The International Journal of Clinical Neuropsychology 9: 11–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baird, A. D., Adams, K. M., Ausman, J. I., and Diaz, F. G. (1985). Medical, neuropsychological, and quality-of-life correlates of cerebrovascular disease.Rehabilitation Psychology 30: 145–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barona, A., Reynolds, C. R., and Chastain, R. (1984). A demographically based index of premorbid intelligence for the WAIS-R.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 52: 885–887.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bigler, E. D. (1990). Neuropsychology and malingering: Comment on Faust, Hart, and Guilmette (1988).Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 58: 244–247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Binder, L. M., and Pankratz, L. (1987). Neuropsychological evidence of a factitious memory complaint.Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology 9: 167–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blankenhorn, A., and Cerbus, G. (1975). Clinical and actuarial evaluation of organic brain damage by psychologists and non-psychologists using the Memory for Designs.Perceptual and Motor Skills 40: 99–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, J. L. (1982). Reply to Woodward.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 50: 289–290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, L. J., and Chapman, J. P. (1967). Genesis of popular but erroneous psychodiagnostic observations.Journal of Abnormal Psychology 72: 193–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, L. J., and Chapman, J. P. (1969). Illusory correlation as an obstacle to the use of valid psychodiagnostic signs.Journal of Abnormal Psychology 74: 271–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, C. M., and Spreen, O. (1983). Psychometric properties of dichotic words tests.Journal of Clinical Neuropsychology 5: 169–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costa, L. (1988). Clinical neuropsychology: Prospects and problems.The Clinical Neuropsychologist 2: 3–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawes, R. M. (1986). Representative thinking in clinical judgment.Clinical Psychology Review 6: 425–441.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawes, R. M., Faust, D., and Meehl, P. E. (1989). Clinical versus actuarial judgment.Science 243: 1668–1674.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dodrill, C. B., and Clemmons, D. (1984). Use of neuropsychological tests to identify high school students with epilepsy who later demonstrate inadequate performances in life.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 52: 520–527.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faust, D. (1984).The Limits of Scientific Reasoning, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faust, D. (1986). Research on human judgment and its application to clinical practice.Professional Psychology: Research and Practice 17: 420–430.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faust, D. (1990). Data integration in legal evaluations: Can clinicians deliver on their premises?Behavioral Sciences and the Law 7: 469–483.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faust, D. (in press). The use of neuropsychological tests to describe and prescribe: Why polishing the crystal ball won't help. In Glueckauf, R., Sechrest, L., Bond, G., and McDonel, B. (eds.),Improving the Quality of Assessment Practices in Rehabilitation Psychology, Sage, London.

  • Faust, D., and Guilmette, T. J. (1990). To say it's not so doesn't prove that it isn't. Research on the detection of malingering. Reply to Bigler.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 58: 248–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faust, D., Guilmette, T. J., Hart, K., Arkes, H. R., Fishburne, F. J., and Davey, L. (1988). Neuropsychologists' training, experience, and judgment accuracy.Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology 3: 145–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faust, D., Hart, K., and Guilmette, T. J. (1988). Pediatric malingering: The capacity of children to fake believable deficits on neuropsychological testing.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 56: 578–582.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faust, D., Hart, K., Guilmette, T. J., and Arkes, H. R. (1988). Neuropsychologists' capacity to detect adolescent malingerers.Professional Psychology: Research and Practice 19: 508–515.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faust, D., and Nurcombe, B. (1989). Improving the accuracy of clinical judgment.Psychiatry 52: 197–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faust, D., and Ziskin, J. (1988). The expert witness in psychology and psychiatry.Science 241: 31–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faust, D., Ziskin, J., and Hiers, J. B. (1991).Brain Damage Claims: Coping with Neuropsychological Evidence (Vols. 1 and 2), Law and Psychology Press, Los Angeles.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischhoff, B. (1982). Debiasing. In Kahneman, D., Slovic, P., and Tversky, A. (eds.),Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases, Cambridge University Press, New York, pp. 422–444.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, H. (1975).The Shattered Mind: The Person After Brain Damage, Knopf, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, L. R. (1959). The effectiveness of clinicians' judgments: The diagnosis of organic brain damage from the Bender-Gestalt Test.Journal of Consulting Psychology 23: 28–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golden, C. J. (1986). Forensic neuropsychology: Introduction and overview. In Golden, C. J., and Strider, M. A. (eds.),Forensic Neuropsychology, Plenum, New York, pp. 1–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golden, C. J., Ariel, R. N., McKay, S. E., Wilkening, G. N., Wolf, B. A., and MacInnes, W. D. (1982). The Luria-Nebraska Neuropsychological Battery: Theoretical orientation and comment.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 50: 291–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, G., and Shelly, C. (1984). Discriminative validity of various intelligence and neuropsychological tests.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 52: 383–389.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gouvier, W. D., Uddo-Crane, M., and Brown, L. M. (1988). Base rates for post-concussional symptoms.Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology 3: 273–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene, R. L. (1988). Assessment of malingering and defensiveness by objective personality inventories. In Rogers, R. (ed.),Clinical Assessment of Malingering and Deception Guilford, New York, pp. 123–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guilmette, T. J., Faust, D., Hart, K., and Arkes, H. R. (1990). A national survey of psychologists who offer neuropsychological services.Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology 5: 373–392.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heaton, R. K., Chelune, G. J., and Lehman, R. A. W. (1978). Using neuropsychological and personality tests to assess the likelihood of patient employment.The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease 166: 408–416.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heaton, R. K., Grant, I., Anthony, W. Z., and Lehman, A. W. (1981). A comparison of clinical and automated interpretation of the Halstead-Reitan Battery.Journal of Clinical Neuropsychology 3: 121–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heaton, R. K., and Pendleton, M. G. (1981). Use of neuropsychological tests to predict adult patients' everyday functioning.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 49: 807–821.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heaton, R. K., Smith, H. H., Jr., Lehman, R. A., & Vogt, A. T. (1978). Prospects for faking believable deficits on neuropsychological testing.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 46: 892–900.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyman, R. (1977). “Cold reading”: How to convince strangers you know all about them.The Zetetic, 18–37.

  • Klesges, R. C., Fisher, L., Vasey, M., and Pheley, A. (1985). Predicting adult premorbid functioning levels: Another look.The International Journal of Clinical Neuropsychology 7: 1–3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klesges, R. C., and Troster, A. I. (1987). A review of premorbid indices of intellectual and neuropsychological functioning: What have we learned in the past five years?The International Journal of Clinical Neuropsychology 9: 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, H. S., Mattis, S., Ruff, R. M., Eisenberg, H. M., Marshall, L. F., Tabaddor, K., High, W. M., Jr., and Frankowski, R. F. (1987). Neurobehavioral outcome following minor head injury: A three-center study.Journal of Neurosurgery 66: 234–243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lezak, M. D. (1983).Neuropsychological Assessment (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lichtenstein, S., Fischhoff, B., and Phillips, L. D. (1982). Calibration of probabilities: The state of the art to 1980. In Kahneman, D., Slovic, P., and Tversky, A. (eds.),Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases Cambridge University Press, New York, pp. 306–334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matarazzo, J. D., Daniel, M. H., Prifitera, A., and Herman, D. O. (1988). Inter-subtest scatter in the WAIS-R standardization sample.Journal of Clinical Psychology 44: 940–950.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCaffrey, R. J., Malloy, P. F., and Brief, D. J. (1985). Internship opportunities in clinical neuropsychology emphasizing recent INS training certificate.Professional Psychology: Research and Practice 16: 236–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • McMahon, E. A. (1983). Forensic issues in clinical neuropsychology. In Golden, C. J., and Vicente, P. J. (eds.),Foundations of Clinical Neuropsychology Plenum Press, New York, pp. 401–427.

    Google Scholar 

  • McSweeny, A. J., Grant, I., Heaton, R. K., Prigatano, G. P., and Adams, K. M. (1985). Relationship of neuropsychological status to everyday functioning in healthy and chronically ill persons.Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology 7: 281–291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meehl, P. E., and Rosen, A. (1955). Antecedent probability and the efficiency of psychometric signs, patterns, or cutting scores.Psychological Bulletin 52: 194–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mensch, A. J., and Woods, D. J. (1986). Patterns of feigning brain damage on the LNNB.The International Journal of Clinical Neuropsychology 8: 59–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mortensen, E. L., Gade, A., and Reinisch, J. M. (1991). A critical note on Lezak's ‘best performance method’ in clinical neuropsychology.Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology 13: 361–371.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pankratz, L. (1979). Symptom validity testing and symptom retraining: Procedures for the assessment and treatment of functional sensory deficits.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 47: 409–410.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reitan, R. M. (1986). Theoretical and methodological bases of the Halstead-Reitan Neuropsychological Battery. In Grant, G., and Adams, K. M. (eds.),Neuropsychological Assessment of Neuropsychiatric Disorders Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 3–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, C. F. (1982). Neuropsychological assessment in education: A caution.Journal of Research and Development in Education 15: 76–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, C. R. (1986). Clinical acumen but psychometric naivete in neuropsychological assessment of educational disorders.Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology 1: 121–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, C. R., and Kaufman, A. S. (1985). Clinical assessment of children's intelligence with the Wechsler Scales. In Wolman, B. B. (ed.),Handbook of Intelligence Wiley, New York, pp. 601–661.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, R. (1984). Towards an empirical model of malingering and deception.Behavioral Sciences and the Law 2: 93–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, R. (1988). Current status of clinical methods. In Rogers, R. (ed.),Clinical Assessment of Malingering and Deception Guilford, New York, pp. 293–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, R., and Cavanaugh, J. L. (1983). “Nothing but the truth” ... A re-examination of malingering.Journal of Law and Psychiatry 11: 443–460.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, E. W. (1984). Theory and development of pattern analysis methods related to the Halstead-Reitan Battery. In Logue, P. E., and Schear, J. M. (eds.),Clinical Neuropsychology. A Multidisciplinary Approach Thomas, Springfield, IL, pp. 50–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, E. W. (1987). A reference scale method for constructing neuropsychological test batteries.Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology 9: 376–392.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, M. L. (1986). Book review [Closed Head Injury: Psychological, Social and Family Consequences. Brooks, N. (ed.), Oxford Press, New York, 1984.]Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology 8: 617–621.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shelton, M. D., and Parsons, O. A. (1987). Alcoholics' self-assessment of their neuropsychological functioning in everyday life.Journal of Clinical Psychology 43: 395–403.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silverstein, A. B. (1987). Accuracy of estimates of premorbid intelligence based on demographic variables.Journal of Clinical Psychology 43: 493–495.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slovic, P., and Lichtenstein, S. C. (1971). Comparison of Bayesian and regression approaches to the study of information processing in judgment.Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 6: 649–744.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sweet, J. J., Osmon, D. C., Rozensky, R. H., and Tovian, S. M. (1985). Comparison of the decision-tree and standard methods of the Luria-Nebraska Neuropsychological Battery.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 53: 185–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tupper, D. E., and Cicerone, K. D. (eds.). (1990).The Neuropsychology of Everyday Life: Assessment and Basic Competencies Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wasyliw, O. E., and Golden, C. J. (1985). Neuropsychological evaluation in the assessment of personal injury.Behavioral Sciences and the Law 3: 149–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wedding, D. (1983). Clinical and statistical prediction in neuropsychology.Clinical Neuropsychology 5: 49–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wedding, D., and Faust, D. (1989). Clinical judgment and decision making in neuropsychology.Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology 4: 233–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willis, W. G. (1984). Reanalysis of an actuarial approach to neuropsychological diagnosis in consideration of base rates.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 52: 567–569.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ziskin, J. (1981).Coping with Psychiatric and Psychological Testimony (Vols. 1 and 2, 3rd ed.), Law and Psychology Press, Los Angeles.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ziskin, J., and Faust, D. (1988).Coping with Psychiatric and Psychological Testimony (Vols. 1–3, 4th ed.). Law and Psychology Press, Los Angeles.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Faust, D. Forensic neuropsychology: The art of practicing a science that does not yet exist. Neuropsychol Rev 2, 205–231 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01109045

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01109045

Key words

Navigation